déjà vu all over again
To those that read my "trip to hell" back in November where I spend 5 days
in a hotel room in Georgia while they fixed my super duty Ford 350 .....I just got back from my final trip to Florida - picked up the Scout (another
story) and started the trip back to MA. Got to Norfork and visited Eisboch
Jr. and his very pregnant wife, then headed north towing the Scout. Got as
far as Fredricksburg, VA and the new, heavy duty diesel Ford 350 died again. After all kinds of debates and decisions, I ended up hiring the tow company
to transport the dead Ford, with a 20' Scout in tow, all the way from VA to
MA. We dropped off the boat in my driveway, then continued to Plymouth, MA and
dropped off the dead Ford in the dealer's lot. Gonna be a bit of excitement
down there on Monday when they open. Eisboch (back from the last trip to hell) |
Eisboch
Dec 11 2005
|
| He works on my Ford - I would be more than willing to ask him if you
wish. |
Shortwave
Dec 14
|
| I use it in my lawn tractor (25 hp Gravely), but I don't use it in my |
Shortwave
Dec 14
|
| Tom, You have peaked my interest enough that I am going to see what additional
data I can find. I have two kids in college, one at Columbia another
Michigan, so I am looking at a way to keep my two cars, till I pay off these
college loans. I think I should have them paid by 2046. Thanks for your input. |
Wm
Dec 14
|
| If you ever travel up this way to visit your Michigan kid, left me
know....I'll buy you a lunch |
P
Dec 14
|
| Paul,
Sure thing. I did drive up with a SUV full of crap, it was one hell of a
long trip. She will store the crap in a rental place over the summer. But
my wife likes to find an excuse to go up and see the kids. |
Wm
Dec 14
|
| If you are up during the summer, we could take a trip down the detroit
river. I remember when I went off to college, just two suitcases (flew down there)
and one ups box my parents shipped. Four years later I returned with a car
stuffed full, towing a trailer stuffed full. I don't know where all the crap
came from. I am out in Ann Arbor a lot......most of our work is just south of the
University. |
P
Dec 14
|
| Please tell me it is not that dreaded school in Ann Arbor.you know,
the one with the silly looking football helmets. |
Dec 14
|
| We looked at UVA, and I thought it was a good school in a great location.
My kids had very specific criteria for what they were looking for, and they
knew it as soon as we would drive on campus. |
Wm
Dec 14
|
| JimH, You sound like you are jealous of a good football team. ; ) Remember the movie the Big Chill? |
Wm
Dec 14
|
| Jealous? How funny! Remind me again...who won this year's *big*
game and when was the last National Championship that team with the ugly
football helmet won? >
> Remember the movie the Big Chill? Yep.....and they also made fun of the ugly football helmet. But they were also all potheads. Is that the connection you are trying to
make? ;-) |
Dec 14
|
| JimH, Most likely, Kevin and I sat together and smoked some home grown while
watching the movie. I am curious why the football helmet is ugly? I could understand if you
wanted to know what the hell it was, but it really isn't ugly. I am curious why you haven't asked me about the "Lions", now there is a
football team. |
Wm
Dec 14
|
| By the way, in case you didn't know the Lions play in one of the toughest
conferences and except for some of the "Football Factories", they had an
undefeated season. ; ) Sat 09/17/05 Fordham Bronx, N.Y. W, 23-17
Sat 09/24/05 DUQUESNE Lawrence A. Wien Stadium W, 23-13
Sat 10/01/05 Princeton* Princeton, N.J. L, 43-3
Sat 10/08/05 Lafayette Easton, Pa. Lafayette TV Network L, 14-7
Sat 10/15/05 PENN* (H) Lawrence A. Wien Stadium L, 16-44
Sat 10/22/05 Dartmouth* Hanover, N.H. YES Network L, 17-6
Sat 10/29/05 YALE* Lawrence A. Wien Stadium L, 37-3
Sat 11/05/05 HARVARD* Lawrence A. Wien Stadium L, 55-7
Sat 11/12/05 Cornell* Ithaca, N.Y. L, 45-7
Sat 11/19/05 BROWN* Lawrence A. Wien Stadium YES Network L, 55-21 This has been their best year in over 50 yrs. They trounced Fordham and
Duquesne (whoever the hell they are) |
Wm
Dec 14
|
| You mean ~~ snerk ~~ the "wolverines". BBAAWWWAAAHHHHHAAAA!!!!!! |
Shortwave
Dec 15
|
| Tom,
But be honest, they have some nice looking helmets don't they? In an
abstract sort of way. I really do not keep up with sports, so I really had to look up the helmets
to see what was so ugly about them. |
Wm
Dec 14
|
| A good football team is 7-4?
"Wm Shakespeare Smithers" <The WordSmith> wrote in message
news:vNCdndPNY_y5Mz3eRVn-gg@comcast.com...
> JimH,
>
> You sound like you are jealous of a good football team. ; )
>
> Remember the movie the Big Chill?
>
>
> " JimH" <me1@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:Oc6dnfduqd2sPD3eRVn-pA@comcast.com...
>>
>> "Wm Shakespeare Smithers" <The WordSmith> wrote in message
>> news:7tqdnQ9uVeleCz3enZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d@comcast.com...
>>> Tom,
>>>
>>> You have peaked my interest enough that I am going to see what
additional
>>> data I can find. I have two kids in college, one at Columbia another
>>> Michigan, so I am looking at a way to keep my two cars, till I pay off
>>> these
>>> college loans. I think I should have them paid by 2046.
>>>
>>> Thanks for your input.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Please tell me it is not that dreaded school in Ann Arbor.you
know, |
P.
Dec 14
|
| Duquesne is a Pa. school......several of by H.S. classmates went there.
And here I thought you were talking about the pathetic Lions of NFL non-fame "Wm Shakespeare Smithers" <The WordSmith> wrote in message
news:376dnVqyJbgqLz3eRVn-sg@comcast.com...
> By the way, in case you didn't know the Lions play in one of the
toughest
> conferences and except for some of the "Football Factories", they had an
> undefeated season. ; )
>
> Sat 09/17/05 Fordham Bronx, N.Y. W, 23-17
> Sat 09/24/05 DUQUESNE Lawrence A. Wien Stadium W, 23-13
> Sat 10/01/05 Princeton* Princeton, N.J. L, 43-3
> Sat 10/08/05 Lafayette Easton, Pa. Lafayette TV Network L, 14-7
> Sat 10/15/05 PENN* (H) Lawrence A. Wien Stadium L, 16-44
> Sat 10/22/05 Dartmouth* Hanover, N.H. YES Network L, 17-6
> Sat 10/29/05 YALE* Lawrence A. Wien Stadium L, 37-3
> Sat 11/05/05 HARVARD* Lawrence A. Wien Stadium L, 55-7
> Sat 11/12/05 Cornell* Ithaca, N.Y. L, 45-7
> Sat 11/19/05 BROWN* Lawrence A. Wien Stadium YES Network L, 55-21
>
>
> This has been their best year in over 50 yrs. They trounced Fordham and
> Duquesne (whoever the hell they are)
>
>
>
> " JimH" <me1@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:3bmdnZwpNYqCMj3eRVn-vw@comcast.com...
>>
>> "Wm Shakespeare Smithers" <The WordSmith> wrote in message
>> news:vNCdndPNY_y5Mz3eRVn-gg@comcast.com...
>>> JimH,
>>>
>>> You sound like you are jealous of a good football team. ; )
>>
>>
>> Jealous? How funny! Remind me again...who won this year's
*big*
>> game and when was the last National Championship that team with the
ugly
>> football helmet won?
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Remember the movie the Big Chill?
>>
>>
>> Yep.....and they also made fun of the ugly football helmet.
>>
>> But they were also all potheads. Is that the connection you are
trying
>> to make? ;-)
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> " JimH" <me1@aol.com> wrote in message
>>> news:Oc6dnfduqd2sPD3eRVn-pA@comcast.com...
>>>>
>>>> "Wm Shakespeare Smithers" <The WordSmith> wrote in message
>>>> news:7tqdnQ9uVeleCz3enZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>>> Tom,
>>>>>
>>>>> You have peaked my interest enough that I am going to see what
>>>>> additional
>>>>> data I can find. I have two kids in college, one at Columbia
another
>>>>> Michigan, so I am looking at a way to keep my two cars, till I pay
off |
P.
Dec 14
|
| Does he work on Fords? It is, after all, an International engine. Nothing yet from the dealership. Eisboch |
Eisboch
Dec 14
|
| I understand your viewpoint and in some ways agree with you. However,
I've used it since day one, it hasn't hurt and based on discussions
here and other venues, it seems to help me, so my net experience is
positive, not negative. As to the test, I think it was poorly designed and proved nothing. |
Shortwave
Dec 14
|
| Tom,
I can tell from your posts that you are a jack of all trades and have a
strong mechanical background. Why did you start using the additive in the
first place? Did you have a problem or was it prophylactic? |
Wm
Dec 14
|
| Strictly semi-prophylactic based on the experience of the local Allis
Chalmers/International/tractor du jour dealer's mechanic who is really
one of the best diesel mechanics that ever lived. |
Shortwave
Dec 14
|
| Do you use it in your gas engines or strictly the diesels due to the
experience of the mechanic? The reason I am asking is most people will keep their diesel engines till
the end of the earth, and they will commonly be rebuilt, so the mechanic can
see if the additive caused any problems. Gas engines on the other hand are not kept as long, and it is hard to tell
if the additive helped or hurt the engine. Even with your positive experience, unless I see some scientific studies, I
am going to hope the oil manufactures are providing the best product
available with the best combination of additives. I would think they have
checked out Lucas to see if it improved the performance of their oil. |
Wm
Dec 14
|
| Worse worn engine I ever got involved with was an old 51 Ford Flathead. Was
driven by an old Italian in Oakand, and I think it never went more than 3
miles in a single trip. 48k miles back in about 1971. Friends kid hit the
car and they bought it off the guy. Engine had at least an 3/16" wear ring
at the top of the cylinders. |
Bill
Dec 14
|
| ===== Foam is mostly air, and air doesn't lubricate all that well. |
Wayne.B
Dec 13
|
| That is true, but it doesn't take a lot of effort to stir up a heavy
oil and turn it into milk shakes. On my old Super M with the torque
amplifier, the oil in the gear case would turn tan after shifting the
PTO out of high speed cutting to low speed bailing. I never used an
additive in that and it still did it. I'm just suspicious of the whole test - it didn't seem very controlled
and appeared to be designed to prove a point rather than be a true
experiment on viscosity. |
Shortwave
Dec 14
|
| I think we should get together and do the test with two large stainless
steel mixing bowls and a couple of whisks. Regardless of the results, we
should pour the oil all over JohnH, drop him into the Potomac, and dial the
guvmint's oil spill emergency number. I gotta go see if the cat's frozen to
death yet. I'll be right back. |
Doug
Dec 14
|
| ===== Why stop with John? I'm sure we could find some other worthy
candidates. Putting all the half baked conspiracy theories aside, if additives are
such a good thing, why aren't the major producers already adding them?
They are already using the additives that research has shown to either
be helpful or are necessary. They have vast resources for development
and testing, and would do just about anything to get a leg up on the
competition. Sorry, but I don't buy it. Always liked that nice minty smell of
Marvel Mystery Oil however, and my old Atomic 4 seemed to do OK being
winterized with it. |
Wayne.B
Dec 13
|
| Tom, I am not a mechanical engineer, and I don't play one in Usenet, so my
knowledge base is very limited in this matter. The real reason I finally
gave up on all the additives is because I felt that any additive that would
really provide an oil company with a superior product, would be added to
their blend. The reviews by mechanical engineers have always agreed with this, but that
does not mean Lucas Oil Stabilizer is not the wonder additive, but I would
be concerned about anything that caused my oil to foam up. |
Lord
Dec 13
|
| When you build a gear train, you don't just rely on rpm to lubricate -
there are pressure ports, the gears are raked, the oil bath has more
volume, etc. I can build a 6x2x6 box and make oil foam under high rpm - it proves
nothing. |
Shortwave
Dec 13
|
| Yeah, but foaming oil *is* one of the reasons why you're not supposed to
overfill, at least with certain types of engines. I wonder why this is a
concern. |
Doug
Dec 13
|
| Photo sent. |
RG
Dec 13
|
| No, I am saying that my experience with Lucas Oil Stabilizer has been
positive and that I have no personal experience to the contrary. As
to higher RPM engines, perhaps the experimenter has a point, but I'd
have to question the size of the gears, the size of the experiment box
and just how fast those gears were turning. I found it kind of
interesting that the oil didn't climb the gears even without additives
either - so what did that prove? It's a faulty experiment. |
Shortwave
Dec 13
|
| I know guys who swear by it and have had 100,000 + mile gas engine
cars and trucks to prove that it as the very least doesn't hurt. |
Shortwave
Dec 13
|
| Scupper's been mixing gin with his prescription meds again. |
Doug
Dec 13
|
| Did you say you had a recipe for wild boar? |
Doug
Dec 13
|
| Oh, I wasn't thinking that. It's just that it's such a cool looking rig.
The boat really dwarfs the truck. Not easy to do with these big trucks. |
RG
Dec 13
|
| Indicative of nothing relative to other cars. |
Doug
Dec 13
|
| info - at - swsports dot org |
Shortwave
Dec 13
|
| I've never turned over 2k on that truck since I've owned it. In
cruise mode, it runs somewhere around 1.4/1.5K so comparatively
speaking, it's not running high rpm. We're also talking rear end
gears here which are an entirely different animal than engine oil. I know guys who mix Marvel Mystery Oil in their gas at 200/1 too -
never been convinced that works either. :>) |
Shortwave
Dec 13
|
| Do I understand you correctly, in your opinion, Lucas Oil Stabilizer is a
godsend for those using low RPM diesels, but you are not sure of higher RPM
gas engines. |
Lord
Dec 13
|
| What kind of mileage did you get with that engine? When it was running that is. :>) |
Shortwave
Dec 13
|
| I've found that my mileage with both my '00 7.3 and my '05 remarkably
consistent. Which is to say a lot less than some of the amazing claims I've
read from others (including you). Which isn't to say that their claims are
in anyway inaccurate or not to be believed, but rather that driving style,
as with most vehicles has very much to do with the final results. In my
case, I've had an incurable affliction with my right foot, that first
manifested itself as a teenager and is with me to this day at 51 years of
age. I prefer to leave stop lights smartly and quickly put distance between
myself and the rest of traffic, assuming I've earned a position at the front
of the grid. On the highway, typical cruising speed is 75-80, and I don't
waste any time getting there. No one ever quotes the drag coefficient of
these trucks, but it must something akin to an old Norge. Which reminds me
that the air conditioning is on nearly year-round in my parts. Given this, running empty at 7200 pounds a bad tank would yield mid 14's
(rare) and a good one would yield about 17 mpg (also rare). 15-16 is the
norm. Like I said, pretty much the same results with both trucks. I
absolutely believe the quality of the fuel varies from tank to tank and is
responsible for most of the fluctuation in mileage between tanks. With the
7.3 towing a 14k pound boat and trailer 65-70 mph I'd get about 8.5 mpg.
Haven't really towed the boat with the 6.0 yet. Sounds really crummy till
you realize that it's a 50% improvement over the 7.4 liter Suburban I
previously owned running empty or only towing a 10k pound boat and trailer.
No complaints from me. |
RG
Dec 12
|
| That's about right, but my overall average is 17 around town and when
I came back from Wisconsin hauling the Halman Nordic 20, I got around
16/17 highway where I normally get about 20/23. I'm not hauling 14K
pounds either. (are you sure it's 14,000 pounds - 7 tons?) I agree with you on the fuel, but I normally tank up at a local truck
stop that has plenty of fresh fuel and if I stick with that fueling
station, my mileage seems to increase. I do use additives to help
with the C-tane rating and I can adjust the computer remotely if I
need the extra HP or not which also helps the gas mileage. In this climate, fuel can contain as much as 25% kerosene in the
winter which can also affect hp and mileage. I do know that my
mileage decreases in the winter significantly - the around town
mileage averages around 13/14 during the coldest periods and the
highway drops to 17/19 depending. I have just under 100K on the 7.3 liter engine and nary a problem or
burp. I really can't complain - it's been a good, solid, efficient truck. |
Shortwave
Dec 13
|
| Actually 14,040 pounds weighed on a certified scale, including 720 pounds of |
RG
Dec 12
|
| I've never manually calculated mileage to date, but based on the truck
computer readings, mileage is roughly as follows: Highway driving, up to 65 mph, unloaded and not towing: 18-19 mpg.
Highway driving 65-75 mph, unloaded and not towing: 17-18 mpg. General around town driving: 16 mpg Highway towing 5000 lbs: 15-15.5 mpg.
Highway towing - 12,500 lbs. (Fifth wheel) 10.8-11.3 mpg. I don't have a heavy foot and rarely "tromp on it". I've noticed that since winter arrived the mileage has dropped by 1 or 2
mpg. I understand that this is due to the winter blend of diesel fuel used
around here that contains anti-gelling additives and also lowers the amount
of btu's in the fuel. The technicians that worked on the truck last month in Georgia told me that
the 6.0L can put out another 100 horsepower with a performance chip. I'll
never bother with it since when it runs it has all the power I need. Eisboch |
Eisboch
Dec 13
|
| Not necessary - I believe you based on the description. I absolutely love my 2000 F-250 and I wouldn't trade the 7.3. for
anything. I still think I can out pull a 6.0, but we'll never know.
:>) Later, Tom |
Shortwave
Dec 13
|
| I don't think I've ever driven the truck at 65 mph on the highway. |
Shortwave
Dec 13
|
| Tom, I read and lost the post where you said you used the Lucas Oil Stabilizer,
and found it to be a great additive. 15 yrs ago I used to use Slick 50, and
thought I got better gas mileage and Slick 50 said it protected better than
regular oil. Unfortunately, it also clogged up engine. You are obviously smarter than the average person. You obviously are very
mechanically inclined. Didn't that report make you wonder if the additive
was protecting the engine and components when the engine was running at high
RPM? |
Lord
Dec 13
|
| ====== Examples please. I've found their car recommendations to be right on
the mark, audio equipment less so. |
Wayne.B
Dec 12
|
| Exactly. |
John
Dec 12
|
| On my '95 Sierra, I've had to replace the muffler (with dual exhaust and decent sound from Midas),
the hose to the heater, one door handle, and the dash mounted drink holder. It's got 113,000 miles on it. BUT, today I had to take it in for a new clutch. I figure it's good for another 100,000.
--
John Herring Hope your Christmas is Spectacular,
and your New Year even Better! |
John
Dec 12
|
| What's one of those guys sell for? I paid $19,700 for mine, but I get only 17mpg on the highway.
--
John Herring Hope your Christmas is Spectacular,
and your New Year even Better! |
John
Dec 12
|
| I'd like to see them evaluate voice quality for cell phones. By this, I mean
the quality of the microphone, earpiece, and the execution of the background
noise cancelling scheme. These are all purely hardware issues. Some cell
phones absolutely suck. |
Doug
Dec 12
|
| Good advice. I am going to see how this repair works out because otherwise
I like the truck very much. I agree with all you said - mine's a 350 -
little stiffer springs but still yields a nice ride. It was interesting
that the salesman wanted to find the build date because I've heard "rumors"
that there was a major flaw in the engine design that was corrected after a
certain date. Thanks, Eisboch |
Eisboch
Dec 12
|
| It may be a concern that doing so would affect their good gas mileage
reputation.
A full sized truck of 10,000 lb GVW or more with 4 wheel drive just ain't
gonna get good gas mileage, no matter how advanced the design of the engine.
Gasoline has about 130,000 btu's of energy, diesel about 10,000 btu's more.
Converting that energy to do work isn't magic. Eisboch |
Eisboch
Dec 12
|
| I believe the 6.0 came out in the 2003 model year, and for a while you could
purchase an '03 with either the 7.3 or the 6.0. The early 6.0's were indeed
fraught with problems, but as I understand it, most of those issues were
worked out by the 2004 model year, and by the 2005 model year, things were
essentially as good as the 7.3 ever was, at least in terms of reliability.
The approximate build date of your truck is printed on a sticker on the
trailing edge of the driver's door, in the format mm/yy. The exact build
date of your engine can be read on the sticker on the Fuel Injection Control
Module in the format dd/mm/yy. The label on the FICM is difficult to read,
but doable. You'll find the FICM on the driver's side of the engine near
the firewall under the coolant recovery tank. My engine has a build date of
October 22, 2004 and a the sticker on the door reads 10/04. Here's what the FICM looks like: http://dan.prxy.org/Truck/6L_bible_html/html/Page_010.html I'd be interested to hear what the current diagnosis is, as well as the
dealer's remedy. |
RG
Dec 12
|
| Lyle's '68 Stang never lost in the local 1/4 mile on Route 1. |
Bert
Dec 12
|
| I'm sure that if and when Toyota chooses to address that market niche,
they'll do so very nicely. |
Doug
Dec 12
|
| When did CR begin evaluating boats? There is nothing to that effect in their
index of reviews. Are you drunk again? |
Doug
Dec 12
|
| Doug,
CR is a well intentioned group of individuals who don't seem to have a clue.
The don't review boats, but they seem to miss the mark on all other
products. It seemed that they would always pick the product with the worst
quality. |
Lord
Dec 12
|
| It's silly to point to situations where cars are maintained by expert
mechanics and constantly tweaked. |
Doug
Dec 12
|
| For some products, they really are off base. Stereo equipment's a good
example. When I was in that biz back in the late 70s & 1980s, they'd always
recommend Japanese speakers, which sounded horrible. And, Sanyo car stereos,
which were an absolute joke at the time. With cars, though, I think they're between a rock and a hard place. Some
people like to slam their reliability surveys because they primarily cover
very young cars. But, how long does the average buyer keep a car? Is it that
easy to find a large sample of people whose cars have reached 100,000 miles? For things like appliances, I don't think it's possible to do any better.
But, the magazine *does* educate some readers about features they might not
have otherwise considered. This is important because considering the low
quality of most retail staff, you might never hear about these features in
the stores. It ain't perfect, but I have yet to hear anyone come up with constructive
suggestions. |
Doug
Dec 12
|
| No...nothing at all, at least as far back as their index goes, which is
quite a few years. It would be ridiculous anyway. Scupper's drunk again. |
Doug
Dec 12
|
| Harry, I won't even drive to certain parts of this city because commercial
strips disgust me so much. No way I'd drive that far to look at a gun! A
$3000.00 Alembic bass guitar....maybe. But not a gun. |
Doug
Dec 12
|
| You sort of have to take what you read on the internet automotive forums
with a grain of salt. The number of people who take the time to praise
their vehicles on these forums is quite small when compared to the people
who are more than happy to take the time to bitch about whatever problems
they've had. In other words, it's hardly an unbiased sampling. I'm very
sorry to hear about the problems with your truck, Richard. I owned a 2000
7.3 F250 SuperDuty which was not a daily driver, but more of a tow vehicle
for the boat and weekend driver. In 5 years, I only put 50,000 miles on it,
but they were all trouble-free. In December 2004, I traded it for a 2005
model of the same truck with the 6.0 liter PowerStroke. Again, only about
10,000 miles since the trade, but they have all been trouble free. In fact,
the only work that's been done to it are oil and filter changes. As much as
I liked the 7.3, the 6.0 liter is so much more refined, as is the 2005 truck
over the 2000 model (both Lariats). The 6.0 liter behaves completely
different than the 7.3. It doesn't have near the low rpm grunt as the 7.3,
but get it above 1500 rpm and it's all there and then it winds almost like a
gasser. As a highway cruiser, the 6.0 is far superior. Much quieter and a
better powerband than the 7.3. As a stump puller, hard to beat the 7.3.
Much improved suspension on the 2005 model, as well as a much tighter
turning radius for the 4X4's. Point being, in spite of your troubles, it
might be premature to second-guess your purchase decision. It was a smart move having the truck towed to the selling dealer. It sounds
like they will do whatever it takes to make things right and put your bad
luck behind you. If you haven't found this place already, here's what I consider the best of
the Ford Truck forums: http://forums.thedieselstop.com/ubbthreads/ And to a lesser extent: http://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/index.php |
RG
Dec 12
|
| I'll tell you flat out - they build a truck the size of my F-250 with
a good solid diesel (that, I might add, they are fully capable of
making) with 4 wheel drive I would consider it. The only other
foreign car we've ever owned was a Corolla and that was a great little
car. |
Shortwave
Dec 12
|
| It's impossible to know why they haven't made such a truck. But, if I had to
take a guess, I'd say they think they cannot overcome the cultural inertia
that's still present in buyers for that type of vehicle. Cars are in a very
weird category of their own, compared with other products. I doubt many
people notice that their washing machine is made in Mexico, nor do they
really care. But cars occupy an almost religious place in the hearts of some
people. |
Doug
Dec 12
|
| The turbo is the problem. The high pressure pump on Eisboch, is not the
major source of the problem. Same Turbo as GM, but I understand GM uses
hydraulics to control the turbo (variable vane) and Ford uses electronics,
and the programming suxs. |
Bill
Dec 12
|
| I had a 94 F-150 XLT Lariat best pulling truck I ever had in 4X4 (locking
front and rear differentials).
But man it was not reliable! In 36,000 miles and 1 year it had the following repairs: brake pads and rotors replaced 4 times (rotors kept warping) fan clutch replaced 2 times HVAC repaired 3 times they finally found the orifice was missing from the
system, the darn thing would only blow cold air while traveling on the
interstate, any time you went to in town traffic mode it blew hot air. Radio quit 2 times. So I traded it on my 96 Subaru Outback and so far it has never been in for
any repairs. My 00 GMC has had the transfer case replaced, the steering gearbox replaced
and the P/S pump replaced (all under warranty) since then it has been a
truly reliable vehicle. I wish you well with your Ford quality issues. |
FREDO
Dec 12
|
| IMHO FORD = F%#$&@ Over Rebuilt Dodge |
FREDO
Dec 12
|
| Yup. After the first breakdown I did a bunch of internet searching and
found that this engine, introduced in 2003 to replace the 7.3 L, has had
some serious teething issues but the 2005's (mine) are supposed to have the
problems resolved. It is, however, scheduled to be replaced with yet another
engine in 2007. I also searched GMC and Dodge diesel forums and found both
of them are full of horror stories of problems with the GM Duromax engines
and, in the case of Dodge, transmissions as well. BTW, Ford sells as many
diesel powered trucks as GMC and Dodge combined on a yearly basis. I suspect a problem again with the high pressure oil pump that was replaced
when it died last month in Savannah. I noticed that there was a small pool
of very clear oil-like fluid under the engine. I am guessing, but I think
it may be the oil used in the high pressure pump that actuates the fuel
injectors. Surprisingly the salesman that sold me the truck showed up at the dealership
as we were unloading it, even though they were closed. He has promised to
make it right, including a full price credit for another truck if I want. He
acknowledged that some of the 6.0 L engines had problems and he wanted to
check and record the build date of my truck, which turned out to be January,
2005. He then said they may replace the whole engine, depending on the
build date. I am going to wait and see what the problem is. It may be something like a
connection to the pump that was not tightened properly when it was installed
in Savannah - or something like that. If it is another pump failure - then
I have to think about a replacement truck or replacement engine. Or a
bicycle. It's been a hell of a week. The day the movers were packing up the Florida
house Mrs. E's car got run over by a Federal Express semi-trailer truck
just as the auto transport company showed up to take it to MA. Mrs. E's
fine, but her little BMW has a hood that looks like an accordian. The next
day when I went to pick up the Scout at the storage place I found the gate
chained and locked and the telephone service disconnected. They had gone
bankrupt the day before and were apparently in court receivership. I got
into the yard by following a guy who opened the gate and drove in. Turns
out he was a mechanic who used to work there and was picking up his tools.
When he opened the gate, I pulled up right behind him and blocked the gate
so they couldn't close it. It was quite a scene as I hooked up the boat
trailer while people were yelling at me that I couldn't take it. I did, but
it's quite a story. Eisboch |
Eisboch
Dec 12
|
| I don't know. I can't quite picture you in a F-350 4x4 Harley Davidson
edition. Eisboch |
Eisboch
Dec 12
|
| Isn't life fun when you are retired? |
Shortwave
Dec 12
|
| Horse feathers. I don't believe it. |
Shortwave
Dec 12
|
| Saved what life? She hit in just under 35 mph. It was a Honda 125 |
Shortwave
Dec 12
|
| That 6 liter has had a series of problems that the 7.3 never had.
Personally, I think it's way too small for the kind of torque it
produces and that's the major reason why it's having these kind of
problems. I would have purchased a new diesel a couple of years ago, but I
wanted to stick with the 7.3 because I didn't think the 6 liter was
going to hold up - call it intuition I guess. I'm glad I didn't. |
Shortwave
Dec 12
|
| Haha! I am glad GM and Ford marketing propaganda is working on you. Haha... |
Dan
Dec 12
|
| I have owned several Fords and the worst thing that ever happened was when
the computer died on one vehicle. Had to get it towed, dianosed, and fixed
for a total of $200. |
Bert
Dec 12
|
| Go take a look at the Ford's in their King Ranch version. I call them
Maximum Cow. Damn, they look and feel good. |
Bert
Dec 12
|
| Believe what you will - Subaru's suck. Oh, and that nonsense about Forester having more ground clearance than
my F-250? Talk about marketing propaganda. |
Shortwave
Dec 12
|
| Get with the times dude. :>) They solved that problem years ago. |
Shortwave
Dec 12
|
| The problem with the paint was universal with all American Cars built in the
80's. I think it had to so with a reformulated paint with the ClearCoat.
The problem was bad enough that all manu.'s offered an undisclosed 5 yr
warranty on the paint. I had both of my cars repainted for free when they
started to flake after 3 - 4 yrs. |
Lord
Dec 12
|
| 6 liter diesel? |
Shortwave
Dec 12
|
| = If you are like me, you will eventually come around to the point of
view that you will never buy another Ford product. That has
subsequently been modified to "never another non-Japanese vehicle". Unfortunately Toyota does not yet make a super duty pickup but I
wouldn't be surprised if they eventually come up with something. |
Wayne.B
Dec 11
|
| Sorry to hear it. Let us know what the diagnosis is if you don't mind. -rick- |
-rick-
Dec 11
|
| HEY!!! Take that kind of talk somewhere else. |
Shortwave
Dec 12
|
| ===== I have one and it is a darned nice truck. I won't bore you with the
details of my Ford story but needless to say it was not a good one. |
Wayne.B
Dec 11
|
| === Define "fixed". It's hard to fix what was poorly made. Detroit has had so many wake
up calls over the last 30 years and they still have not figured it
out. |
Wayne.B
Dec 11
|
| Define sensible. |
Shortwave
Dec 12
|
| FORD - Found On Road Dead
I can't wait for Toyota to start making something comparable to the 350 -
and then it's bye bye American brands. |
Dan
Dec 11
|
| Probably what saved her life. If she was driving a Ford, there would be a
good chance she would come out with something worse than a bruising. Plus, do you believe another car would have less damage? Subarus are
extremely solid. Looks what people race at rallies where you drive these, un
modified in many cases, 80 MPH on dirt roads... Show me one American car
that could take that abuse... |
Dan
Dec 11
|
| Consumer Reports is a joke. They just do cursory evaluations of the
vehicles. The real test is how many of the trucks are still on the road 10, 15 and 20
years after they are built. |
Bert
Dec 11
|
| FORD = First On Race Day |
Bert
Dec 11
|