Free Credit Report

newbie wants to buy a boat

Hi boat people! I have been a lurker here for a week or so,have enjoyed reading all your posts. I have found a 1989 16' "Forester"-red and white.Has a 65 horse Merc on it.This boat looks like it has never been in the water,but the upholstery is quite beat from the sun.[top panels of seats are all 'cracked,peely and faded. Now,I know this is a 'pleasure boat' or would you call it a runabout,or???? But,my primary use of the boat will be for fishing.[I also have available a 8 horse motor for use in lakes which are restricted to smaller motors] Is anyone familiar with this boat? Who makes it? Should I buy this and fish from it,or would I be better off buying the very old 14' Lund fishing boat I found for a lot less money? Also,would it be much harder to put this 16' fiberglass boat into and out of the water,than say,the aluminum 14 footer?? Can anybody give me a 'guestimate of the weight and/or top speed of these two boats,the fiberglass 16' with Merc 65 Horse,and the 14' aluminum with 35 Horse Johnson??? My guess would be they would both reach about the same speed,but with the 'glass boat using more fuel?? Right? Please jump in here and give me any advice or insight you may have!!!
52hawk
Aug 22
2006
According to the book by J.P. Lamy, upholstery repairs can involve a prohibitive cost. If the damage is bad (peeling etc), you should walk away from the deal.

Think, read, be patient. There could always be a better 2nd hand boat deal available next week. Fall is a buyer's market. If the deal is not very good, you don't need to take it.

Risto

Varis
Aug 23
Looks like Forester was a brand, from maybe 1974-1994. Sam
Aug 22
With a boat this old, you may want to do a very careful look see for certain things - such as how solid is the floor and transom, any excess movement in both (like grab the skeg of the engine and lift it up and down watching the transom - any movement, you've got a major problem. Same with the floor - walk about and make sure it's not "squishy". There might be an access panel somewhere for you to take a look-see under the floor - look around. Another good way to check the interior stringers is with a bore light - essentially a long screwdriver looking thing with a very long neck with a light bulb on the end. Stick it in the drain plug hole at the stern and take a look to see if it looks wet - stick your finger in it to check for "gunk" - gunk would indicate that the stringers are going south.

Another trick when inspecting the boat is to find a small rubber hammer (or even a big one) and just tap out the hull and transom - if you hear a solid thunk, then it's probably fairly decent - if you head a dead sounding thud, chances are the wood is no good. Believe me, you will know the difference between a thunk and a thud.

Look for cracks and crazing - this boat will have normal wear/tear issues for it's age, but any cracks/crazing should be surface only and not with any depth.

Even if your are only paying $1,000 or so for the boat, spend $100 shop time and have the engine gone through with a written repair report to you stating compression numbers, condition of the spark plugs, etc. An hour of shop time can buy you a lot of engine inspection.

These boats are no longer in production.

With respect to weights, no clue, but guessing based on other boats of it's type, boat/motor/trailer maybe 1300 lbs - plus or minus 100 lbs.

Aluminum will always be a better boat, but a 14 with a 35 might be a little problematic - in particular with an additional 8 hp kicker. What kind of aluminum boat is it?

Shortwave
Aug 22
Thanks for the quick response, guys!! The aluminum 14' is a Lund. I especially thank you for the hints on checking the hull and transom- being a autobody man by trade,I really don't care for fiberglass much,but the 'glass boat in question looks 100% better than the Lund... There is a wooden panel which lifts out of the center of the floor-I'll 're-inspect the 'glass boat this afternoon Thanks!!!! Shortwave Sportfishing wrote: > On 22 Aug 2006 05:26:01 -0700, "52hawk" <rdell2002@yahoo.com> wrote: 52hawk
Aug 22
   

Disclaimer: This is a computer-generated and formatted feed of current postings to a public
Internet forum. We do not control the information delivered, nor do we endorse or monitor its
content. Internet forums may carry offensive, harmful, inaccurate, and otherwise inappropriate material.
Click to see the RSS XML version of this page   Click to see the Atom XML version of this page