|
inboard vs. outboard
Our family is rapidly outgrowing the boat. Its time for a bigger one.
On a pleasure boat, mainly used for tubing, hydrosliding etc., what are
the disadvantages and advantages of outboards compared to inboards as
far as performance, handling, fuel economy, reliability, longevity? |
Archie
Aug 31 2006
|
| >On a pleasure boat, mainly used for tubing, hydrosliding etc., what are
>the disadvantages and advantages of outboards compared to inboards as
>far as performance, handling, fuel economy, reliability, longevity? Interesting question. I'll readily admit that I'm an outboard type - I much prefer outboards
for a lot of reasons, up to and including performance, economy and
lots of power in a small package. Having said that, for the application you are interested in, I/O or
straight inboards are probably the best choice. Outboards have the
disadvantage of eating up a lot of stern so things like swim platforms
are not practical. And with an outboard, there is always the issue of
danger with a prop exposed - SS props can be sharp and even at idle or
stopped can be a hazard. This is also true with an I/O, but it's not
as dangerous as the I/O will hang the prop lower - plus there is a
swim platform that one can get in and out of. Inboard boats for your application are probably the best overall bet
because everything is hung under the boat. In addition, you can
really get freaky with the horsepower. :>) As to handling, in my opinion, outboards out handle I/Os and inboards
but that's a personal preference. I've been on inboards that handled
like a sports car the steering was so responsive. Then again, I can
do much the same with my outboards so I consider that a wash. My experience with outboards in terms of economy and reliability has
been excellent compared to others who have inboards or I/Os. Generally
maintenance is less (Note: I'm a big two stroke guy so maintenance is
somewhat less than four strokers). Outboards are generally quicker to
diagnose/repair and the cost are somewhat diminished by the fact that
it's exposed and easier to get to than an inboard or I/O. And that, in my opinion, is that. :>) |
Shortwave
Sep 1
|
| And I/O's can take up a lot of room in the boat. My next will be an
outboard for many of the reasons mentioned above.
-- ***** Hope your day is great! ***** John |
JohnH
Sep 1
|
| Bottom line you will have, by far, the most choices in the category of
conventional trailer boats with i/os. If you do not want a real
inboard ski boat then I'd look in this category. If you are staying in
protected water I would also go with a bowrider. |
jamesgangnc
Sep 1
|
| If he's outgrowing the boat then a bowrider probably isn't what he's after. What're the limiting factors of your current boat? What extras are you
looking for? That might help better determine what alternatives to
consider. The usual issues apply, I/O and outboards can be trimmed up but I/O's have
maintenance issues if you're leaving them in the water. Inboards are the
best for maintenance if it's in the water all the time but don't have the
shallower drafts of I/O's. Jet drives have efficiency issues, especially as
you into larger boats. But it raises the question of what is it you want out of the boat ABOVE the
waterline? |
Bill
Sep 1
|
| "> If he's outgrowing the boat then a bowrider probably isn't what he's
after." I'm not sure how you come to that conclusion? Sounds like he is
boating on local lakes and that probably means trailering. If he gets
a cuddy he's got no space forward of the driver for passengers. You
think people like to ride in the cabin of a cuddy day boating on a
lake? Bill Kearney wrote: |
jamesgangnc
Sep 1
|
| >On a pleasure boat, mainly used for tubing, hydrosliding etc., what are
>the disadvantages and advantages of outboards compared to inboards as
>far as performance, handling, fuel economy, reliability, longevity? Compared to the new 4 stroke outboards inboards are starting to lose
just about any advantage they had until you get up around 300HP. |
gfretwell
Aug 31
|
| Well, except for price. Otherwise, the big block four stroke outboards
are superior in almost every way. The Suzuki 300 hp four stroke runs
about the same as TWO four stroke inboards of the same hp. |
Harry
Aug 31
|
| Do you mean outboards verses inboard/outboards verses inboards? Imho, if you are truely into water sports and you trailer your boat
then an outboard is the least desirable. Outboards have superior
weight to power rations but sit on the transom of your boat right where
you will be putting people in and out of the water. If water skiing and/or wakeboarding is particularly importatnt to you
then a true inboard ski boat is the best choice. Top end ski boats are
expensive. If price was no object I would look at the mastercraft
V-drives. But there are a number of good alternatives these days that
are not so pricey. An inboard/outboard is a good economical choice for an all around
trailered family recreational boat. The volume that these are produced
in makes them attractive cost wise. Archie Bunker wrote: |
jamesgangnc
Aug 31
|
| Yes, I meant inboard/outboard....sorry. I would be scared to use a true
inboard around here because of all the stumps here in these East
Texas/West Louisiana lakes. I am also considering jet drive if anyone
has comments about that. Thanks for your responses so far guys. What
about fuel economy on 4 stroke vs. 2 stroke? |
Archie
Aug 31
|
| You might go to www.riverjetmagazine.com forums for jet drive questions.
These are mostly aluminum boats. More expensive than Mastercrafts in lots
of cases. |
Calif
Aug 31
|
| Jet drives do handle shallow water better than anything else but they
use a lot of gas. |
jamesgangnc
Aug 31
|
| The newer Hamilton 212's are about 95% the efficiency of a prop boat. My
Kodiak 3 stage is about 85%. Overall in the total cost of a boat is
negligible. |
Calif
Aug 31
|
|
|
Disclaimer: This is a computer-generated and formatted feed of current postings to a public
Internet forum. We do not control the information delivered, nor do we endorse or monitor its
content. Internet forums may carry offensive, harmful, inaccurate, and otherwise inappropriate material.
|
|