Free Credit Report

A little respect for the commercial fishers

When inconvenienced by a net set, a field of pots, etc. it might be appropriate to consider the following statistics from the FEDGOV. To bring us a fish dinner, commercial fishermen suffer a higher percentage of on the job fatalities than any other group.

***

America's Most Dangerous Jobs Laura Morsch, CareerBuilder.com writer For many of us, the most dangerous part of the workday is the commute

Chuck
Jan 21
Not really. JoeSpareBedroom
Jan 24
Agreed, but the amount that has been cut down is, according to the study, "insignificant" in terms of negative effects on the environment. Something like 90 percent of the forests remain, even after 40 something years of creating new grazing land. And the older, abandoned grazing land is supporting growth of new forests that convert more CO2 to O2 than old forests as they grow.

Eisboch

RCE
Jan 23
OK. JoeSpareBedroom
Jan 23
And cattle and pig farts are causing global warming. ;-) JimH
Jan 23
Several. Chuck
Jan 23
You might want to consider why the resource is diminishing, and it isn't because of recreational fishermen. The North Atlantic cod fishery is a good example. While it has never been high on the recreational fisherman's targets, and was once extremely abundant, it has now collapsed to the point that many scientists feel that it will be unable to recover. The blame for that lies strictly with the commercial interests, and their inability to police themselves. As to your proactive approach, for many fish stocks it is already too late for that. Commercial fishing technologies are so good that much of the fishery ends up as by-catch, or starving, after the bait fish has been turned into fertilizer. This debate is nothing new. It's been ongoing for 30 years as the fish stocks shrink. If there is a positive, it's that the recreational fishery has found it's voice and his exercising his economic power. thunder
Jan 23
Slight detour: I know you read books. This might interest you:

<http://search.barnesandnoble.com/booksearch/isbnInquiry.asp?z=y&EAN=9780140275018&itm=1>

Cod: A Biography of the Fish That Changed the World by Mark Kurlansky

JoeSpareBedroom
Jan 23
Here in Cape Coral most of the navaids are maintained by local government because of taxpayer support and the large number of boaters here, not by USCG. Stop me if I'm wrong but I believe there are charter boats and sight seeing boats that go out from Doctor's Pass, possibly some crab boats also. Wayne.B
Jan 23
They said that about the striper base and that recovered nicely under Short
Jan 23
In the Estero Bay they are privately maintained, as soon as you get out of the ICW. The bad news for the uninitiated, is that the channel depth is not up to CG standards. If you draw more than about 30" of water, don't even think about going into the Estero River. (less at low tide). You will be digging mud between 28 and 30 in spite of some very official looking markers. gfretwell
Jan 23
I can't imagine where they dock those boats inside Doctor's Pass. That's Venetian Bay...and primo real estate. Houses on the water there *start* in the $3 million range.

Gordon Pass has several commercial boats that use it.

NOYB
Jan 23
And then along came George Washington Carver. NOYB
Jan 23
There are a number of marinas after you go all the way north, almost to the airport. At that point the biz jets are about 100 feet off the deck as they come in for a landing. No right thinking bazillionaire would want to live under that flight path. Wayne.B
Jan 23
My bad, I had Doctor's and Gordon's confused on my mental chart. Just checked the real thing for clarification. Wayne.B
Jan 23
That's Gordon Pass that you're thinking of. NOYB
Jan 24
Speaking of mercury exposure.....nice to hear from you again. JoeSpareBedroom
Jan 22
How about yelling at your elected chumps to stop issuing commercial licenses NOW, so as the fisherman die or retire, there will be less commercial pressure? I think I read about that already being done elsewhere. JoeSpareBedroom
Jan 22
??? Can you cite an example? I can't really think what type of infrastructure might help both commercial and recreational anglers. The artificial reef programs are not supported by the commercial fishing industry.

For the most part, the commercial fishing industry (down here anyhow) is mostly a parasite on the resources without contributing anything of value back to the economy.

Meanwhile, the recreational anglers created and now support an entire billiond-dollar industry...namely tackle shops, boat dealers, marinas, boat mechanics, etc.

NOYB
Jan 22
I'd find it hard to believe that there's a more difficult, or more dangerous job than being President of the United States. NOYB
Jan 22
I'm doing my darn'dest to rid the world of mercury...one tooth at a time. It's composite resin or porcelain crowns only for me. NOYB
Jan 22
No you don't. You're just looking for an absurd debate. That, and you failed statistics. JoeSpareBedroom
Jan 22
The problem is that the commercials managed to get their very own Manchurian Candidate on the NMFS council.

Dr. Roy Crabtree is the NOAA Fisheries Service's Southeast Regional Administrator. He's also a shill for the commercial fisherman, and has opposed every suggestion to buy out the commercial licenses as they expire.

NOYB
Jan 22
You have time and money. Instead of complaining here, how about walking around the marina with a petition, and sending it to your governor? Then, follow up with phonecalls until his office gives you an appointment. Hell...my son and his friends got a defective math teacher repaired in 9th grade using a petition. You should be able to do it. Ask the local newspaper for help. They're always looking for stories, especially in backwaters like Rat Mouth. JoeSpareBedroom
Jan 22
The same is being done to the bunker in the Chesapeake, except that the commercials are using them for fertilizer and fish oil. The effect on the bay is tremendous. -- ***** Have a super day! *****

John H

JohnH
Jan 22
Perhaps they were some 30 to 40 years ago. ;-)

They primarily net yellow perch and walleye.

JimH
Jan 22
I would agree that the two facts you present don't seem to make sense when isolated.

The missing brick in the logic wall would have to be, "What has happened to the commercial fish limit?" Is it the same as ever, is it increasing while the recreational fishermen are being cut back, or are the commercial fishermen experiencing a reduced limit along with the recreationals? I certainly don't know the answer, but it could be that a scarce resource is still being distributed about like it always has been.

Chuck
Jan 22
Back in the early 80's (83 me thinks) I worked as a waiter at a BBQ place on Lake of the Ozarks for a summer. There was this gal who worked on a crab boat out of Alaska that was just a couple years older them me.

She was the only persons to survive a crab boat sinking. She told us about it and it was amazing she survived at all. She told us the boat was getting rocked pretty hard when a crab pot crushed someone. A fellow crew member at one point threw her overboard. She said she recalled seeing the boat roll shortly after that and could still see the skipper in the wheel hours trying to keep it from turning over.

After being in the water a short time she said she was stating to blackout and could hear voices but could not longer see anything. The next thing she knew she was on a helicopter and was being put in water that felt like fire, but was apparently icewater that was much warmer then the sea she can out of.

Her skin had a very pale tone to it, I have no idea if it was from that or not. But I always suspected it was.

Capt Jack R..

Jack
Jan 22
What is the governor going to do about a rogue NOAA director?

Commercial licenses are Federal permits. It's not a state issue.

NOYB
Jan 22
Not yet. But, I guess you're right. You should do nothing but complain about it here, where nobody from any governmental agency will ever see it. This way, your expenditure of time is minimal and you can get back to your next martini, and leave the hard work of being a real citizen up to somebody else. Or, to nobody.

Traitor.

JoeSpareBedroom
Jan 22
I think that the buoy system and navaids in general might be a good example, not to mention breakwater maintenance and harbor dredging.

If not for commercial interests of one type or another, there would be little support for spending on these activities.

Wayne.B
Jan 22
No gold?

My gold crowns have proven to be extremely durable and no mercury is involved as far as I know.

Wayne.B
Jan 22
And you have state people that sit in the Federal Congress and Senate. Calif
Jan 23
Major problem is bycatch. Depending on the fishing method, here can be huge amounts of bycatch. Very valuable fish, but since the season is closed on them or the allotment for the dragger is already met, they are shoveled overboard. There is always a 5 mile line of birds feeding behind a drag boat. The jig boats or hook and line guys are not raping the resource, most are starving, except for stick fisherman (a live fish for the Asian market trade) which can rape the resource also. The rapists are the big net boats. We have whole schools of tuna wrapped by a net boat or two. Zero escape to propagate the species. Off Tijuana, MX they have 100s of pens where they raise the smaller tuna that have been netted and feed copious amounts of bait fish. The bait fish overfishing is probably even more harmful. There is a lot of herring netted in the SF bay for the roe. The rest is used as fish meal fertilizer. The catch was dropping off, so the netters have asked for a smaller net opening size. Now you are going to catch all the spawners, just not the large herring. If I can get the link to work, I will post it to a writeup from a friend who used to be on the PFMC. Calif
Jan 23
The shuttle is a death trap. What other vehicle has a 40% failure rate? I think the Thunder Thud had a better record over Vietnam. gfretwell
Jan 22
>> 43...for a mortality rate of 9,302 (per 100,000 workers). gfretwell
Jan 22
raise your own livestock; commercial farmers rape the land ;-)

Shaun

Shaun
Jan 23
Yeah. Farmers, too. JoeSpareBedroom
Jan 23
The recreational limits were set using suspect data. They polled people at boat ramps for the first half of 2004, and then extrapolated for the rest of the year. We had three hurricanes practically back-to-back-to-back right after the surveys were completed, and nobody went fishing for those three months.

The data is wrong for 2004.

Additionally, the commercials kill about 80% of their by-catch. Recreational kills about 20%. The quotas don't account for that either.

Most of the depletion is due to the by-catch...not the actual take.

NOYB
Jan 23
LOL. Have you been taking grumpy pills while I've been away?

Several hundred members and I from a fishing forum in Florida already wrote our Senator about this issue when they were trying to lower the limit on total grouper (not just red grouper) from 5 to 3. The letters were apparently successful:

http://www.sptimes.com/2005/08/09/State/Senator_protests_grou.shtml

The reason that I'm posting about the regulations on rec.boats is so that everybody else who is unaware of NOAA's unfair treatment of recreational anglers can also write a letter.

Capisce?

NOYB
Jan 23
Doug said to write a letter to the Governor. The proper venue to air the complaint is with U.S. House and Senate members. NOYB
Jan 23
Gold is excellent. In fact, it's the "gold standard" to which all other restorations are measured. But nobody seems to want metal anymore. NOYB
Jan 23
I find that hard to believe. There are no commercial boats running out of Wiggins Pass, Clam Pass, and Doctor's Pass...and hardly any out of Gordon's pass. Yet the navaids and buoy systems in those passes are maintained just fine. In fact, they're currently dredging Wiggins pass and Clam pass. NOYB
Jan 23
Cattlemen and farmers do not deplete a resource without replacing it. Can you say the same about commercial fisherman? NOYB
Jan 23
Always start local. They're the most vulnerable politicians, and the ones with the biggest ambitions. They're also the ones most likely to be "beholdin' to" local interests. On the take, in other words. JoeSpareBedroom
Jan 23
And here we have the polar opposite to the commercial idiots - the recreational idiots.

It's not about sustainable fisheries, it's about getting ours.

Short
Jan 23
Gee - that's about what the commercials say. same coin, different Short
Jan 23
Farmers USED to deplete resources. Cattlemen still do, depending on which beef you're referring to. Quite a bit of beef comes from Latin America, where rain forests have been replaced with grazing land whose products feed just one industry: Fast food. JoeSpareBedroom
Jan 23
On the other hand, recently released studies indicate that the negative impact of cutting down forests, including tropical rain forests, have been greatly overestimated in the past. The total amount is insignificant in the grand scheme of things and, surprisingly, cutting down old trees allows new trees to grow that have much greater positive impacts on the atmosphere and environment. The overall effect is positive.

Another case of over-zealous doomsayers?

Eisboch

RCE
Jan 23
Maybe, but new trees do not grow on grazing land. Otherwise, it would not be useful as grazing land. JoeSpareBedroom
Jan 23
Working alone and PTO's are a dangerous combination ;-)

I wonder what the fatality rate is for solo sailers?

On an aside, i think its time for me to consider future careers. Ive been unfortunate enough to work in logging, fishing, structural iron and steel, truck driving, truck building, construction and in foundries. On top of that my hobbies include motorbike racing, rock climbing and sailing. I wouldnt class myself as an adrenaline junkie, i rarely get a rush, just the pleasant focus, and a momentum to consciousness. Isolation is sometimes its own reward ;-)

In my spare time Ive been a mountain and cave rescue worker for 5 years and a year in the new zealand coastguard. Now Im working in the mines here in australia, underground as a contractor and also part of the mine rescue team.

Im pretty proud of the fact that i dont hane too many scars, but its probably a combination of luck and caution. a lot of guys in these industries are so called 'hard man' types who look down on anyone using eye protection, gloves etc. They increase their own risk of injury. Some of these industries are inherently high risk because of dangerous processes, like hooks whizzing past your ear on the deck of a fishing boat.... but i read a statistic recently that really disturbed me; I cant remember the exact terms and numbers used, but they said that 'not so obvious' fatalities by far outnumber the 'more obvious' types by a multiple of more than 10. While getting your leg ripped off by a PTO and bleading to death is a gruesome way to go, these are nothing compared to the number of people who quietly slip away each year due to long term exposure to chemicals, gasses, heavy metals, toxins, dust and so on. Im hoping that these statistics are represented in the mian by the older generation who worked harder rather than smarter.

As for the ilness statistics.... i wouldnt pay them too much mind. Ive had quite a few of those ilnesses myself, quite often after a few too many beers, or mysteriously when the weather is right for sailing/surfing/climbing ;-) A lot of my co-workers seem to suffer the same fate; the day after pay day people are quite often feeling under the weather.

Shaun

Shaun
Jan 22
>appropriate to consider the following statistics from the FEDGOV. To >bring us a fish dinner, commercial fishermen suffer a higher percentage >of on the job fatalities than any other group.

The fishers that are in grave danger are not the guys who drop pots in the bay or net mullet in the canal behind your house. They are the ones who drop pots in the Bering sea or fish off the Grand Banks.

gfretwell
Jan 22
Indeed.

In fact, if that sub group were isolated from the statistics reflecting commercial fishing in general we can be almost certain the figures would be much, much higher.

Chuck
Jan 22
Did you catch the show on Discovery Channel about crab fishermen a while back? Pretty harrowing work. JoeSpareBedroom
Jan 22
That's the nutsiest fishery ever imagined. Middle of winter, Gulf of Alaska, sea state: u-g-l-y

(Makes a good case for the allocation style fishery rather than a defined season. Instead of saying, "Everybody go out and fish like mad for two weeks and keep everything you can bring aboard" the allocation system says "Vessel X is entitled to catch 12,000 pounds of Alaskan King crab within this 45-day window of time". Vessel X can stay in port a day or two if the weather is going to be lot worse than usual without missing out entirely on a big chunk of the season, and if Vessel X has poor luck she can sell some of her unused allocation to other boats that have hit the jackpot.)

It seems like we lose a Seattle-based boat and crew every year or two up there. Crabbers can have a high COG, especially with all the pots on deck. Then there's the ice- a lot of times there's a crewman assigned to constantly chip the ice off the boat, and he or she has to chip it off faster than it's building up.

After watching that fishing series on Discovery Channel, nobody would ever complain about the price of crab again. :-)

Chuck
Jan 22
Catch your own fish. Or eat beef. Commercial guys rape the waters.

"Chuck Gould" <chuckgould.chuck@gmail.com> wrote in message

NOYB
Jan 22
Presidents:

8 died while in office...4 from natural causes and 4 by assassination.

If you just use the number who have been assassinated, that's 4 out of 43...for a mortality rate of 9,302 (per 100,000 workers).

Average salary: $400,000.

At least it pays well.

NOYB
Jan 22
> Vic
Jan 22
I agree. JimH
Jan 22
Hmm. So unless a person is wealthy enough to have an offshore fishing boat similar to something that might be owned by a dentist down in Naples, FL and the luxury of enough time to use it, he or she should not be able to eat fish?

Is Mrs. NOYB's name Marie ("let them eat cake") Antoinette? :-)

Consider this: There would be a lot less infrastructure to support sport fisheries if the same infrastructure couldn't be at least partially justified as a support for commerce. Commercial and sports fisheries, properly managed with an eye toward conservation in a perfect world, should be able to coexist.

Chuck
Jan 22
Jim, can I then assume you don't eat any seafood that doesn't come out of Lake Michigan? On the end of your personal fishing line?

No Alaska King Crab, Louisiana shrimp, or even tuna fish for you. :-) Bummer.

Chuck
Jan 22
It's there, or close, in some places. Read "The Secret Life of Lobsters", in which officials from the state of Maine, who've never fished for lobsters attempt to tell lobstermen about conservation, and end up learning that the lobstermen already had a pretty good system in place to begin with. Now, they cooperate instead of argue. JoeSpareBedroom
Jan 22
The problem is that the commercial's don't want to coexist - they want it all. And they want it now.

In the NE, the recreationals are constantly being hammered by the commercials to the point where recreational quotas are consistently reduced to maintain the commercial side of any fishery. Seasons are reduced on the whim of the commercials if their tonnage in any given fishery is down, size and quotas changed every year on recreationals without commercial penalty for being over tonnage, the by catch situation is getting more and more serious with virtual destruction of the eco system - in particular Narragansett Bay where you can't find bunker in the summer.

I'll give you a good example of the rape and pillage. ARC Bait out of New Jersey comes into Narragansett Bay every Spring on a permit from the RI DEM using spotter planes to "fish" for bunker - menhaden. Guess what they do with the menhaden?

Sell them back to the recreational fisherman. You can't find menhaden in Narragansett Bay after ARC Bait finishes and the net result is that there is less forage resulting in fewer quality fish for recreation.

You can't stop them because they have a commercial permit to catch as much as they can in a one week period - curiously enough, right in the middle of the major migration period. It's their "right". Last year they were caught over quota - $1,000 fine. Big whoop.

Oh, and don't ask the various Eco cops to actually enforce by-catch laws or enforce quota rules - heaven's to Betsy, we don't have the man power to do that. Instead, let's measure the fish the recreationals catch at the boat ramps instead - and fine them - oh, $1,000 or so a fish if it's 1/16th inch under.

I don't want to hear about commercials.

Short
Jan 22
NP Chuck. I boat and fish on Lake Erie, not Lake Michigan.

Just because I eat fish does not mean the commercial fishermen are not raping the waters. They sure are on Lake Erie.

JimH
Jan 22
Lake Erie. duh, of course. Zero points to Gould for geography.

So you agree with NOYB that commerical fishermen are raping the waters, but disagree with NOYB that everybody should catch his or her own fish. Thanks for the clarification.

Hope your recovery is progressing.

Chuck
Jan 22
What do commercial fishermen catch on Lake Erie? JoeSpareBedroom
Jan 22
Large-scale commercial fishing *is* ruining fishing generally in many places around the world and is seriously depleting the variety and amount of fish and other ocean and lake species. There's no reason to tolerate it. Harry
Jan 22
Yes. JimH
Jan 22
I'm surprised you missed the obvious factor in the equation. The occupational loss of life for the other occupations are on an annual basis. Regardless of the indivdual holding the office at any given time, I think most Americans are very thankful that the typical annual mortality for POTUS is *zero*.

Funny how inflation changes things. An experienced french fry jockey, aka "assistant manager" at the local fast food joint now makes as many $$ per year as Abe Lincoln made as President. (Presidential salary was $25,000). Most white collar middle managers now outearn JFK's presidential salary, ($100,000, plus a $50,000 expense account which Kennedy refused to accept). It's doubtful the either the french fryer or the second tier accountant would think they make enough money to risk getting shot on the job. :-)

Chuck
Jan 22
I don't think that everybody whould catch his/her own fish. But curbs need to be imposed on commercial fishing.

The commercial guys take 89% of the grouper out of the Gulf...yet they keep reducing the limits for recreational anglers.

That makes no sense.

NOYB
Jan 22
Mercury-laden fish. NOYB
Jan 22
   

Disclaimer: This is a computer-generated and formatted feed of current postings to a public
Internet forum. We do not control the information delivered, nor do we endorse or monitor its
content. Internet forums may carry offensive, harmful, inaccurate, and otherwise inappropriate material.
Click to see the RSS XML version of this page   Click to see the Atom XML version of this page