Marina Information
We've been building a web-based site for boating over the last 14
months. There are a few things that come close to what we've been
working on, but nothing that goes as far or as deep. It's called
ActiveCaptain (www.activecaptain.com).ActiveCaptain is not commercial. There is no cost. There are no
advertisements. It is designed to be a place where you can find
marinas, anchorages, and local knowledge visually on worldwide maps.
It should be fast and interactive...and fun. We've loaded the initial database full of 8,000 marinas in the US.
Each entry holds 116 fields broken up into 5 sections and 49 groupings.
The database includes common things like phone number, lat/lon,
website, etc. but we also track things that aren't often documented -
are pets welcome, diesel price/date, internet access, slip price per
foot, and many other items. There is also an extensive capability for
reviewing and rating a facility. Anchorages and "local knowledge" are
much simpler and will be added next. We need people to review the marine facilities in their area and make
additions, corrections, reviews, etc. We need a lot of people. ActiveCaptain is all about community. The framework will allow others
to share their knowledge and experience. Adding the information you
know into this framework will help many others and end up helping
yourself when you cruise to an area that you are less familiar with. ======
Jeffrey and Karen Siegel
Castine, Maine |
on_the_water
Jan 25
|
| I want to see the "TOS" for rec.boats or for any other USENET newsgroup. |
Bert
Jan 26
|
| Most USENET newsgroups have a charter that outlines what is and is not
acceptable to post in the group. Unfortunately, rec.boats does not
have a charter. So really, there is no such thing as an off topic
post in rec.boats. Anything goes. Now, your ISP probably (most do) have a TOS that spells out a lot of
things you can't do. You should check your individual ISP's TOS. Steve |
Steve
Jan 27
|
| well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:
Since I am quoted... I'll try again.... I said, "web based forums." I
did not mean, nor did I imply any USENET newsgroup. In fact, I
specifically had in mind those (privately held) forums that had TOS
and in most cases moderated (censored) content. Rec.boats was created before charters were deemed necessary and when
people acted with a bit more decorum than they do now. It is sad
social commentary. So, you can come here and be as bad as you want to be. Then, the only
remaining venue will be a private site where you can go say (only)
what the moderator wishes others to see and where you have to adhere
to a certain code of behavior or be sued.... Thus, there is no charter, there is no TOS, there is, however, an
out-of date FAQ:
http://www.faqs.org/faqs/by-newsgroup/rec/rec.boats.html Have at it.....
|
Gene
Jan 27
|
| How do you enforce acceptable and not acceptable for USENET charters
that were written and approved, by vote of the UUNet/Internet masses 20
years ago. Do you remember the Richard Depew(sp?) incident of the early 90's? > Now, your ISP probably (most do) have a TOS that spells out a lot of
> things you can't do. You should check your individual ISP's TOS. Only if you are threatening someone. If you are just being an asshole
then they won't do anything. |
Bert
Jan 27
|
| I do - it was an interesting application. I bet 'cha can't guess who uses cancelbots currently (without looking
it up that is). |
Short
Jan 27
|
| You are correct, I have no idea who is using cancelbots today. I just
remember that I was involved in tiff with The Dick about his actions. He
said that he had been appointed/approved as a net cop by somebody I
can't remember. I asked to see his badge and he said he didn't have one. |
Bert
Jan 27
|
| The Church of Scientology. They use something called Cancelbunny. |
Short
Jan 28
|
| That makes sense due to the fact that their religious texts are |
Bert
Jan 27
|
| 10-4 |
Short
Jan 28
|
|
All you have to do to get rid of most of the useless slime here is for
usenet to require that real names and IPs be used in posting. That would
be the end of at least 90% of them. |
Harry
Jan 27
|
| Yep...shine the light of day into the dark crevices. |
Don
Jan 28
|
| Is that because they would be well behaved like you are, Harry?
--
***** Have a super day! ***** John H |
John
Jan 27
|
| Let's not forget the wars about "sigs" because they used up too much
bandwidth! --Mike |
Mike
Jan 28
|
| You both take usenet far too seriously, but I would suggest that using a
"real name" could lead to truly serious complications. Besides the
annoyance of additional spam, more than one person has been the victim of
identity theft due to online activities. Then there are the even more
serious issues, stalkers, pedophiles, etc. Using your real name flies in
the face of all online recommendations, and is basically stupid. |
thunder
Jan 28
|
| I think you've touched on several of the reasons Harry would like everyone
to use their real name (and address, and phone number).
--
***** Have a super day! ***** John H |
John
Jan 28
|
|
Whatever. Nowadays, I just stuff the a**holes into my Bozo Bin. As of this morning, the following boys are playing with each other in there: allota fagina
..
M15
US CVNS
Montgomery Scott
Not Me
John Herring
Fredo
Reggie in all his known false IDs
Charles
Dan Krueger
Elvez
Bert Robbins
Screw you
Jackoff
whoamInot
JB It only takes a couple secs to stuff the latest a**hole in there. |
Harry
Jan 28
|
| Curious that you should bring that up. I've always felt that nicks are an essential part of Usenet
philosophy. It gives you some freedom to be who you are, but it also
insulates you personally from, as you say, stalkers, etc. You don't
see the great posters of years ago - Gharlane of Eddore, Deacon, James
Boe (one of Usenet's Ten Most Wanted), Motar the Imperious, Namtar,
modesty forbids me from naming a couple of my own :>) - the list keeps
going and too many to list separately. All of them were witty, wrote
acerbic laugh out loud funny and always meaningful commentary not only
in the groups of their interest, but other groups as well. There were
a lot of elite posters who engaged in free debate without rancor,
employed no small amount of wordsmithing skills and most eventually
became friends - the Code Duello in those Golden Days wasn't personal
as much as it was to have a good discussion/argument. However all that changed and Usenet is now a wasteland of petty and
often inconsequential utterings of petty little tyrants who can't stay
on point if their life depended on it. And Usenet has been usurped by
the blogosphere with the less enlightened and skilled remaining on
Usenet diddling on themselves in an orgy of stupid, irrational and
often uninformed musings. Oh well... :>) |
Short
Jan 28
|
|
Please. The amateur "blogosphere" is a universe of souls who cannot
write and insist on demonstrating it at every opportunity. It's no
different than usenet, except the posts are longer and sometimes they're
illustrated with photos or artwork. There are some good blog sites
written and maintained by professional writers and editors, and some of
them are readable, but only in small doses. The problem with many usenet groups is that they have been infested with
slime who think they can get away with posting any sort of insult they
like because they're "anonymous." If you filter out the trash from these posters, you'll have a more
readable newsgroup here: allota fagina
..
M15
US CVNS
Montgomery Scott
Not Me
John Herring
Fredo
Reggie in all his known false IDs
Charles
Dan Krueger
Elvez
Bert Robbins
Screw you
Jackoff
whoamInot
JB |
Harry
Jan 28
|
| Thanks Harry! You *are* the man!
--
***** Have a super day! ***** John H |
John
Jan 28
|
| >If you filter out the trash from these posters, you'll have a more
>readable newsgroup here: In other words, anonymous posting is OK, if you're someone to whom Harry
wants to suck up!
--
***** Have a super day! ***** John H |
John
Jan 28
|
| Harry posted his comment and his "list" just to get a rile out of
everyone on his "list". He is upset since he no longer can post 100's
of insult a day responding to OT posts, I try ignore his comments
because it is the only thing that really pisses him off. |
Reginald
Jan 28
|
| considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: >Using your real name flies in
>the face of all online recommendations, and is basically stupid. It is a new world, thunder. My employer posts more about me online
than I ever have on Usenet..... .....identity theft can't get very far without some pretty specific and
personal information... which *shouldn't* be posted.
|
Gene
Jan 28
|
| John... you seem desperate to get Harry's attention. If you try being nice,
you may even get another invite out on his boat.
just think...you'd have a 'captive audience' out there on the Bay a couple
miles offshore. |
Don
Jan 28
|
|
I guarantee that 90% of the snarkiness (and most of the snarks) would
disappear if proper ID was required for posting. |
Harry
Jan 28
|
| I'm sure you believe that, but it just ain't so. There are many blogs |
Short
Jan 28
|
| Experts in a field who can write are not part of the 'amateur blogosphere.' |
Harry
Jan 28
|
| What do you consider "amateur"? |
Short
Jan 28
|
| Tom,
I would be interested in some links to some of the blogs you rate highly. |
Reginald
Jan 28
|
| Bloggers who have no real experience or useful non-general information
in a particular field and also cannot write. |
Harry
Jan 28
|
| Exactly my thought. |
Short
Jan 26
|
| Ain't that the truth. It's funny - My long time good friend Harold Foskett
http://www.foskettequipment.com/html/about_us.html has an entire
collection of antique machine tools - all of which still work and he
can do amazing work with them - some of it I swear you can't do on a
CNC machine. He has an original Heald internal grinder - how about
that? Years ago, I bought a Bridgeport from him when I was into restoring IH
tractors and trucks. It's an old Bridgeport, but it still does a
great job. Not being a machinist by training, I can do some simple
stuff with it, but even at it's age, I can't really use all of it's
capabilities - it's kind of like a really fancy drill the way I use
it. :>) If any of you are up here, I'd be glad to take you on the Foskett
Equipment Tour of IH tractors and trucks - there are some incredible
machines in his collection. |
Short
Jan 26
|
|
Speaking of H, I actually saw one of those monster IH pickup trucks in a
parking lot in Annapolis. Bright yellow. I want one. |
Harry
Jan 26
|
| Really? Cite examples. |
Bill
Jan 26
|
| Want to start with Peggie Hall? |
gene.boating
Jan 26
|
| Peggie Hall continues to use and post advice to other boating NG's,
including non moderated UseNet forums. When Peggie left rec.boats.
she was very adamant why she stopped posting in rec.boats. She was
tired of the personal inflammatory attacks by one of more (at the time,
the most) prolific regulars in rec.boats. The personal, inflammatory attacks, and the off topic political
bickering that was the norm in rec.boats for so many years is reason why
most of the professionals left rec.boats. |
Reginald
Jan 26
|
| I had lunch with Peggie maybe a year and a half ago, and that is |
Chuck
Jan 26
|
| I rememebr that. it was most unfortunate, and totally uncalled for. |
Tim
Jan 26
|
| I'm not talking about rec.boats.... though you are quite correct in
what you say. |
gene.boating
Jan 26
|
| What you're really building is a commerically viable list of emails for
people interested in boating. You should disclose that you must provide
an email address and "register" to use your site. Good luck staying current with the price of fuel at "8000 marinas". You
must have a staff of about 20? :-) |
Chuck
Jan 25
|
| Not only must you "register," you must agree to their Terms of
Service. More to the point..... Personally, I will refuse to post content to
any site with this sort of Terms of Service. (That is one good thing
about USENET.... we may have a few Net-Cops, but no attorneys.) I don't see any point in assigning rights to *MY* intellectual
property over to *ANYBODY*, without a monetary reward. However, if we
are talking rights to a book or movie deal, we'll talk.... Additionally, I refuse to indemnify any site, nor will I, for any
reason, agree to pay their legal or accounting fees. Regarding
assumption of liability, I just don't believe that anything good can
result from the use of the term, "without limitation." If you are curious, the website's Terms of Service can be accessed
from the bottom of their home page. IMHO, if the OP's intent is to create a venue that,".....is not
commercial. [with] no cost. [and] no advertisements....." it should
be spun entirely away from his corporation and run as a fun, free, and
non-commercial site. Then, the disconcerting legalese can be dropped. Just my $.02. |
gene.boating
Jan 25
|
| >people interested in boating. You should disclose that you must provide
>an email address and "register" to use your site. That's what "throwaway" hotmail addys are for. www.hotmail.com |
Wayne.B
Jan 25
|
| The Privacy Policy listed on the ActiveCaptain web site is very
explicit about how an email address will be used. Like the Privacy
Policy on this site (Google Groups Privacy Notice :
http://groups.google.com/intl/en/googlegroups/privacy3.html), we do
require that you register to make additions to the site. Unfortunately, we live in a world with too many lawyers and we need to
protect ourselves should someone enter libelous information on our
site, as well as protect users from unauthorized access. We are not
charging for the use of this site and don't want a frivolous lawsuit. Our goal is to create something that will be useful for all boaters.
If all participants simply offer honest, true information and opinions,
we will all benefit. |
on_the_water
Jan 25
|
| Gene, I am sorry that our web site has upset you. It was certainly not
meant to do that. Our intent is to provide a resource for fellow
boaters. The web site arose out of our own desire to have access to
this sort of information as we have cruised up and down the East Coast. You are wise in advising potential users to read our Terms of Use page.
Everyone should read these documents for every site they access. You
may wish to reread the Terms of Service page for this web site
(http://groups.google.com/intl/en/googlegroups/terms_of_service3.html)
which also requires you to "indemnify" them (Section 13), to
provide personal information to register (Section 3) and controls the
content (Section 4). It is unfortunate that in the times we live in we must worry about
lawyers. However, as a free web site we really don't want to fight
lawsuits. Like Google, who provides this free service, we must attempt
to protect ourselves. The spirit of ActiveCaptain is a place where we can share information
and help one another have safer and more fun boating experiences. I
hope you will some day take part.
Karen |
on_the_water
Jan 25
|
| I've never indemnified anyone for using this group. But then, I don't do so
through Google. |
JohnH
Jan 25
|
| On 25 Jan 2007 11:11:14 -0800, on_the_water penned the following well |
Gene
Jan 25
|
| On 25 Jan 2007 10:37:40 -0800, on_the_water penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:
If you guys have not yet, in your trip south, transited the area south
of New Bern, you should know that there are some *very* shallow ICW
areas from north of Snows Cut in Wilmington to the Lockwood Folly
Inlet area, approaching SC. Additionally, abreast the town of Southport.... be VERY careful of
your attention to the map. Any mis-reading of same is sure to put you
hard aground.....
|
Gene
Jan 25
|
| What's Google? Rob |
trainfan1
Jan 25
|
| Again, register for what? What's Google Groups? I didn't sign up for
any of this... Rob |
trainfan1
Jan 25
|
| == Gene, you have waaaay too many cool machine tools. I'd be happy to
have one lathe and one milling machine, just have to convince my wife
that they'd look good in the front room and be a conversation piece. |
Wayne.B
Jan 25
|
| Just get an old Bridgeport, clean it up and put a large lampshade on the
motor. Eisboch |
Eisboch
Jan 25
|
| Heh, you first. |
Wayne.B
Jan 25
|
| well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:
Relax.... you are using mozilla.... and posting through US DATA
NET.....
|
Gene
Jan 25
|
| considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:
That's the ticket!
|
Gene
Jan 25
|
| considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:
You collect them with age.... I'm an antique....!
|
Gene
Jan 25
|