Free Credit Report

Florida judge limits rights of local governments to regulate use of public waterways

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Press Contact: Scott Croft, 703-461-2864, SCroft@BoatUS.com Date: November 1, 2007

BOATU.S. MEMBERS PREVAIL IN FLORIDA ANCHORING DECISION

A recent Collier County, FL, court decision that found a restrictive Marco Island recreational boat anchoring ordinance in violation of state law could help lead to a statewide solution to Florida's patchwork of local anchoring laws.

The Marco Island ordinance restricted recreational boaters to a maximum 12-hour anchoring period when located within 300 feet of a seawall, and maximum six-day anchoring period anywhere beyond that distance. Collier County Judge Rob Crown's October 26th decision said that the Marco Island ordinance was "an unlawful regulation of publicly owned sovereign waterways in violation of Florida law."

BoatU.S. Vice President of Government Affairs, Margaret Podlich, said, "Across Florida other local governments have enacted similar ordinances, that unfairly give local interests control over public waterways. We hope this court decision contributes to a statewide solution that is fair to all Florida citizens." Earlier this year, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission held a series of six stakeholder meetings around the state to hear concerns about anchoring issues.

To get the anchoring case to court, BoatU.S. member Dave Dumas, a resident of Marco Island, FL, intentionally broke the law in January of this year because he and other local boaters from the Sailing Association of Marco Island thought it was overly restrictive.

Another BoatU.S. member, Donald Day, Esq., of the Naples, FL, law firm Barry, Day, McFee & Martin, handled the case pro bono.

Said Day, "As a result of Judge Crown's decision and current state statutes, many local governments around the state have advised me that they will not be enforcing their anchoring ordinances and will look to the state for guidance in the form of a uniform anchoring regulation. A lot of credit goes to BoatU.S. members who contacted their local governments to voice their displeasure with these inconsistent, arbitrary and restrictive ordinances."

Said Dumas, "The City Council thought they could do whatever they wanted and chose to take the position of a select few in this community. But they should have maintained a neutral position and arbitrated a solution that benefited all citizens."

In Marco Island, a yet-to-be-announced special closed-door meeting of City Council members and the city attorney will decide whether to appeal or accept Judge Crown's decision.

BoatU.S. - Boat Owners Association of The United States - is the nation's leading advocate for recreational boaters with over 650,000 members.

Nov 1
2007
Just because you are paranoid, doesn't mean they are not out to get you. Reginald
Nov 4
His tin foil hat fell off and he's under the control of the government. Short
Nov 2
I thought it was the Iluminati he was worried about. Hope he's OK. Wayne.B
Nov 2
As a boater, and someone who has lived on the water most of my life, if your going to live on the water, you have to learn to take the good with the bad, you have to recognize that the water behind your property is not yours. Their will be times when someone decides to park their boat right where you want it least, probably at the worst possible time. If you buy a house on the water where eyesores tend to drop anchor, and you paid a milloin dollors for it, that's your mistake, "let the buyer beware". That's like someone that buy's a house next to an airport, and wants us to feel sorry for him because of all the noise. That's not going to happen.
Nov 2
I'm a product of similar background and circumstance and couldn't agree more. Granted, an intolerable situation can arise once in awhile but there's generally some way to deal with it other than an ordinance that interferes with the rights of people that it shouldn't.

Rick

PhantMan
Nov 2
Who do you think runs the government?

We do!!

Right Tim?

Short
Nov 2
This is all good news of course, particularly to us since it is in our home base cruising backyard of SWFL. Boat US deserves little or no credit however. All of the risky and potentially expensive legal work was done by concerned locals, and they did a great job. I think we need to find ways of prodding Boat US into becoming a lot more proactive with regards to fighting these legal battles. Unfortunately they seem much more interested in pursuing their commercial interests like insurance. Wayne.B
Nov 1
I suppose that will be true until some guy anchors his house barge next to your dock and decides to live there. Ft Myers Beach had the same issue with the floating slum they had behind Matansas Pass. They really had a hard time regulating illegal dumping, noise and general eyesores bobbing a couple hundred feet form some guys million dollar house.

I didn't really have a "Vick" in that fight but it was easy to see both sides had a point.

gfretwell
Nov 1
Yes, I'm familiar with all that. The Florida law, still in effect, addresses those issues by making a distinction between cruisers and liveaboards. The Marco Island law was onerous because it was directed at cruisers, and because of the 300 ft seawall restriction on anchoring. No legislation is required to control noise and dumping. Those laws already exist. Wayne.B
Nov 1
BoatUS likes to take credit for a lot of things nationally they put no money or effort into. Short
Nov 1
Crikey...it might be Crazy Larry from Charleston. :>} HK
Nov 1
>Crikey...it might be Crazy Larry from Charleston. :>}

Who has been strangely quiet lately.

Wayne.B
Nov 1
   

Disclaimer: This is a computer-generated and formatted feed of current postings to a public
Internet forum. We do not control the information delivered, nor do we endorse or monitor its
content. Internet forums may carry offensive, harmful, inaccurate, and otherwise inappropriate material.
Click to see the RSS XML version of this page   Click to see the Atom XML version of this page