Free Credit Report

Elite 50 in Paducah

I feel a little better about my fishing after seeing the results of the Elite 50 in Paducah. Some of those guys had a real tough time, too.

Most interesting story was Mark Menendez to me. He is a local guy and I met him at our registration - he was representing Skeeter and Yamah. He also spoke at our banquet - very nice guy.

He qualified for final six on the last day of the Elite 50. At some point during the day he removed his life jacket in a prohibited area - the dam below Barkley or KY Lake - can't remember which - has signs saying Life Jackets Required. He must have pulled into that area to fish and took his off - dumb mistake. We discussed that rule at the Southern Regional because several members of the GA team were fishing there and we agreed they would have to wear the life jackets.

Anyway, Menendez realized his mistake and called the BASS tournament director, and was disqualified. He said he had the winning weight in the boat, too.

Could you be that honest? Don't know if his observer noticed, or would have reported him. He said it was bad enough being disqualified, but would be worse to win then be DQed. Interesting how this played out as opposed to the Classic where Iaconelli was supposedly shown on TV not zipping up his life jacket while running the gas motor. Wonder how that was different - other than he did not report himself if it happened.

I am not sure dumb safety mistakes like that should result in the death penalty - some penalty is deserved, but not sure about disqualification. Cheating should result in a lifetime ban, but making a dumb mistake? I know I worried at the Southern Regional because I often slip on my lifejacket, crank the motor and let it idle while I zip up. That would be a disqualification if I did it in a BASS tournament. Ronnie fishing.guide@about.com http://fishing.about.com

rgarri7470
Jun 24
2004
Unless you were Iaconelli, evidentally.

RichZ© www.richz.com/fishing

Jun 24
I also thought that disqualification seemed harsh for an inadvertent violation, especially when it offered no advantage as far as catching fish. But I've never fished a tournament and know little about operating them.

I wonder if the goal is ease of administration as opposed to justice. Right now it seems pretty easy; violate a rule and you're disqualified. If they were to ease up, would they need to have different penalties for different violations, making it a lot more difficult to administer?

Nevertheless, the DQ still seems harsh--the punishment doesn't fit the crime.

Marty
Jun 24
When a group submits itself to a rule not set to the higher standard of the law then expediency will prevail more often than not.

On the other hand you have to have great respect for those who obey the rules and call their own fouls.

Bob
Jun 23
   

Disclaimer: This is a computer-generated and formatted feed of current postings to a public
Internet forum. We do not control the information delivered, nor do we endorse or monitor its
content. Internet forums may carry offensive, harmful, inaccurate, and otherwise inappropriate material.
Click to see the RSS XML version of this page   Click to see the Atom XML version of this page