|
all things equal - does longer rod length = casting distance
been wet wading a smallish river lately with smaller lures for SM and as
usual it seems more often than not, I can't quite reach the real action
in the middle of the bigger pools or of course, the other shoreline with
the lighter lures (tiny torpedo, pins minnow, zara puppy, etc) and I'm
getting line knots as well. its a hike to the river so its a one rod
deal and I have been using medium action rods and its obvious the rod is
not loading up as it does with the heavier lures like a chug bug which I
whale a mile and figure I need to break down and get a ML rated action
at least.so my question, all things equal (same make of rod, same line, same
reel, same lure weight rating), for overall casting distance, would it
be better to get the 7'6 over the 7 footer? will that extra 6 inches
add much? I figure my 7 footers cast further than my 6'6 but those are
all different makes and models so I really can't be definitive about the
added 6 inches, thus the question to experience on what would be my
first 7'6 rod. I don't want to get a 'light' rod as I think this would
be too much a noodle rod on the boat for LM and prove too selective as I
think I will like a light lure rod on the boat as well for situations
when the guy running the trolling motor is fishing different than me and
I similarly need the distance with light lures. |
dscotts
Jul 24 2004
|
| Practice practice practice.... I have a pretty good partner and we switch off whose boat we use, but
sometimes we wind up back boating each other. For puitching distance
Hammer (my partner) is pretty incredible, but I have gotten to where I can
pitch or sidearm well enough to get my bait in where I want it often enough
to catch soem fish. I know I haven't really answered your question. Yes I do believe that rod
length can help, but for light lures I would look at line size and rod
action. On Oak Creek I have fished inline spinner baits as light as 1/16th
oz by going down to 6lb test on a light action rod. A comprimise might be
to use a small size of Power Pro. Supposedly the smaller diameter relative
to line strength supposedly gives slightly better castign distance, and the
no-stretch qualities might help to over come some of the slowness of a
lighter power and/or slower action rod. JMHO.
|
Bob
Jul 24
|
| I do a lot of small tackle fishing for bass and other species, and have
found that a full spool of the lightest weight line you can use (or thinnest
diameter if using a super line), coupled with a long, light-action rod gives
the best casting distance. I can fling a 1/16 oz rooster tail pretty darned
far using a full spool of 4# test Trilene -- even on a 5' ultralight action
rod. Farther in fact than on a 6'6" medium-light rod. I think it's easier to
"load" the rod with a lighter action. The full spool, IMHO, is just as important. Fewer turns required for the
line to peel out as much line. Less friction thru the guides, too. |
Daniel-San
Jul 24
|
| I'd personally go with the longer rod, but not just for the reasons others
probably have in mind. I also fly fish, and a longer rod gives you some
advantages over a shorter one, assuming you have the room to use it.
1) A long rod does give you a slight casting distance improvement.
2) Longer rods give you better line control. If, for example, you throw a
tiny topwater plug across the current, a longer rod helps you keep more line
off the water, giving you more direct contact with the plug for better
hookset, less drag on the plug by the current and better overall control of
your bait.
3) A longer rod also gives an advantage in fighting a fish. You get better
leverage and angle control to guide the fish out of the nasty places they
like to hide. You also have a better shock absorber to cushion the surge of
a big fish. By using the rod to tire the fish out instead of ripping him
from the brush pile and winching him over the weeds, you can get away with
much lighter line than most bass fisherman would think possible. Mark ---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.726 / Virus Database: 481 - Release Date: 7/22/2004 |
Mark
Jul 24
|
| yep...
|
RichG
Jul 24
|
| In your instance I would stick to a rod in a med/light class,
in the 6'6 " tot 7'0" range. Look to a larger spool for your
reel and fill it to optimum(sp). Look for a quality rod, such as Loomis
,Alstar,or the like . Your reel and the guides and their placement will all
have bearing on your casting distance. It is a combination of all the above
that will give you the best casting distance.
|
D.Norton
Jul 24
|
| I agree with Dave... make sure the rod you buy -- whether custom-built or
mass-produced -- has guides in the right place. Having used custom-built
rods by Dave Norton and Steve Huber, I can personally vouch for the
advantages of properly set-up rods when it comes to casting ease, distance,
and accuracy. Yesterday I was at Fishermen's Blessing, a Nashville tackle shop owned by
Don Beck. In addition to selling high performance tackle, Don builds custom
rods and teaches rod building in the shop. Customers can come in and build
their rods right there on the premises over a period of days or weeks, as
their schedule permits. (Don also runs an instructional guide service
similar that focuses on instruction -- how to select and use tackle, rods,
and other equipment -- rather than just putting the clients on fish.) I showed him two All Pro rods I had just purchased, and he conducted two
tests on them to determine if the guides were properly positioned in
relation to the spine and if the spacing was correct. As Don evaluated the
rods, he mentioned that those two factors could make a huge difference in
casting distance and accuracy, compared to a poorly constructed rod using
identical materials. I think he said it could be as much as 25%. He
cautioned me that a high price tag and excellent reputation didn't ensure
proper construction and suggested that if I carefully check even premium
brands, I'll find the majority of them do not have guides properly aligned
or spaced. Joe Haubenreich "D.Norton" <therodmaker@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:10g5u4fnv7av304@corp.supernews.com...
In your instance I would stick to a rod in a med/light class,
in the 6'6 " tot 7'0" range. Look to a larger spool for your
reel and fill it to optimum(sp). Look for a quality rod, such as Loomis
,Alstar,or the like . Your reel and the guides and their placement will all
have bearing on your casting distance. It is a combination of all the above
that will give you the best casting distance.
|
Joe
Jul 25
|
| Joe -- what were the two tests? I think I know how to test the spine, but tell
me again so I know for sure. Thanks. Family, Friends, Fishing,
Rob Storm
http://stormsrestaurants.com |
rstorm453
Jul 25
|
| Sure thing, Rob. Often we just look at the material used in a rod's
components and assume if high-quality parts are used, we're getting a good
rod. In actuality, most rods on the racks are not constructed properly, so
the user will never get optimum performance even when premium components are
used. It's probably a good idea for anyone planning to spend $50, $100,
$200, or more to conduct a quick test to make sure they're getting the best
rod for the money. 1. The first test conducted by Don Beck at Fishermen's Blessing was intended
to locate the rod's spine. He had a hardwood stand that looked like it might
have been home-made. It was constructed of two 1" x 4" x 12" boards, joined
to form an "x," resembling an old, wooden Christmas tree stand. In the
center of the "x" was a 1-inch diameter stainless-steel cone (spine finder
tip) that resembled a plumb bob tip with its point upward. (See
http://www.rods4u.com/tackle/rtools.html for illustration). Don centered the butt of the rod on the point of the cone and then, with the
rod vertical, placed the palm of one hand on the rod tip. Then he gently
pushed against the side of the blank with his other hand, and as the rod
arched, he allowed it to rotate freely so that when the rod came to rest the
spine was on the outside of the curve. He actually rolled it slightly one
way and then the other to see if it would rotate back to the same point each
time. On the perfectly-built baitcaster where guides are on the top, they
were opposite the spine (on the inside of the curve). On a spinning rod
where guides are on the bottom, they should be exactly on the spine, along
the outside of the curve. This placement keeps the rod from twisting to one
side while fighting a fish. You may get some disapproving glances, but it might be worth it to build a
pocket version of the spine-finder tool and take it with you to the tackle
shop next time you are in market for a rod. Place it on the floor and test
each rod until you find one with properly aligned guides. You could probably
build one from a 3" x 3" piece of 1/4-inch plywood (large enough to anchor
with the toe of your shoe on one corner) and a 1-inch wood screw protruding
through it. 2. The second test checked the guide spacing. Don had a length of fly line
(about 10 feet) with a wire lure clip on one end. The other end passed
through the end of a stainless steel trotline hook -- about 4/0 -- and then
was tied back to the main line with two half-hitches or a taught-line hitch.
(Another version in his workshop had a little leather tab that served the
same purpose as the knot.) This formed an adjustable loop with the hook
dangling in the center. Don hooked the clip around the last guide's shaft inside the supports (not
through the line guide ring), and then he centered the hook tip in the butt
of the rod and adjusted his knot (which slid easily on the coated fly line)
so the rod was arched. The tip section ended up at approximately 45-degree
angle to the butt section of the rod. Next, he tied a piece of monofilament line through the bottom guide, at the
side of the ring closest to the rod, and threaded the line through all the
guides. He then tightened the fishing line, rotated the rod so the guides
were along the outside of the arch, and then looked from the side to see if
the mono contacted the blank at any point. He explained that guides should
be positioned so that during the cast the line would feed through the guides
without slapping the rod, which robs the cast of distance. Last, he checked guide wraps (making sure that on single-foot guides the
thread was not only over the foot, but that a few turns were under the foot
at the top to keep the guide from working loose), checked for roughness,
nicks, or scratched in the blank itself, examined the quality and
construction of the cork grip, and verified the alignment of the reel seat
with all the eyes (looking down the length of the rod to make sure
everything lined up). He probably did several more things that I didn't
notice before pronouncing the rod worth buying. I'll bet RodMaker could fill
in some gaps and create a great "rod-buyer's guide" for our FAQ. So, there you go.... take your coiled up flyline/hook/clip, a length of
monofilament line, and your pocket spine-finder with you to make sure your
next fishing rod performs optimally. Joe Haubenreich
Joe -- what were the two tests? I think I know how to test the spine, but
tell
me again so I know for sure. Thanks. Family, Friends, Fishing,
Rob Storm
http://stormsrestaurants.com |
Joe
Jul 25
|
| Joe, & Rob on a baicaster the guides will be on top off the
spine in a convententional setup. In a spinning rod the guides will be at
180 degrees to the spine. Again this is a conventional setup. There are
variations which can increase both casting distance and fish fighting
abilitiy. As for the spine finding test, an easy way to do this in a store is to set
the but end on the floor. Hold the rod at 45 degrees, with the tip end in
the palm of one hand use the othe to put a bow in the rod downward. Push
down at about 2/3 of the way up the rod. A spinning rod will show the guides
on the inside of the rods curve. While a csating rod will show the guides on
the out side of the curve. If you see anything else put the rod back on the rack! To test a rod for guide placement is more difficult in a store. The best
thing to do is "train" your eye to what is
right. However that cannot tell you if the stripper guide
of a spinning rod is correctly positioned. Only putting a reel on the rod
and test casting will tell you this. And for all the fancy spine finding geegaws, the method I described is the
easiest to use . You will actually be able to feel and see the spine
jump.Besides you stand a better chance of not being chased out of the store. I had occasion to use this method at the BPS in Nashville,
I even showed a clerk how to do it . A few minutes lateer
I spied him checking the spine on rods randomly.
Go figure! |
D.Norton
Jul 25
|
|
|
Disclaimer: This is a computer-generated and formatted feed of current postings to a public
Internet forum. We do not control the information delivered, nor do we endorse or monitor its
content. Internet forums may carry offensive, harmful, inaccurate, and otherwise inappropriate material.
|
|