|
O.T. a little - "Worms On A Hook Don't Suffer?"
I hope this isn't too off topic but it has to do with fishing. I found
this on "Reuters Oddly Enough". I wonder what PETA has to say about this?
JohnOSLO (Reuters) - Worms squirming on a fishhook feel no pain -- nor do
lobsters and crabs cooked in boiling water, a scientific study funded by
the Norwegian government has found. "The common earthworm has a very simple nervous system -- it can be cut
in two and continue with its business," Professor Wenche Farstad, who
chaired the panel that drew up the report, said Monday. Norway might have considered banning the use of live worms as fish bait
if the study had found they felt pain, but Farstad said "It seems to be
only reflex curling when put on the hook ... They might sense something,
but it is not painful and does not compromise their well-being." The government called for the study on pain, discomfort and stress in
invertebrates to help in the planned revision of Norway's animal
protection law. Invertebrates cover a range of creatures from insects
and spiders to mollusks and crustaceans. Farstad said most invertebrates, including lobsters and crabs boiled
alive, do not feel pain because, unlike mammals, they do not have a big
brain to read the signals. Some more advanced kinds of insects, such as honeybees which display
social behavior and a capacity to learn and cooperate, deserve special
care, she said. "We have particular responsibility for animals that we have in our
custody. That is not a scientific opinion, but the ethical side of the
issue," Farstad said. |
john
Feb 8 2005
|
| IMHO, not OT, and very interesting. Do you know the date of the
Farstad report?
Guy A
Ripley, TN |
Guy
Feb 7
|
| It said Monday & was dated today so I'm guessing it was released today.
here's the link I pulled off the news page I got it from, hope it helps. http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=oddlyEnoughNews&storyID=7557037&src=rss/oddlyEnoughNews John |
john
Feb 8
|
| Thanks--but I followed the link to Reuters, read the article, and it
does not give a date for the Farstad report itself. Feb.7 is only
the date of the Reuters article. It appears that Reuters dropped the
journalistic ball here! Guy A
Ripley, TN |
Guy
Feb 7
|
| Re: O.T. a little - "Worms On A Hook Don't Suffer?"
Group: rec.outdoors.fishing.bass Date: Mon, Feb 7, 2005, 10:17pm From:
ganderso@toast.net (Guy=A0F.=A0Anderson=A0Sr.)
On Tue, 08 Feb 2005 02:28:51 GMT, john <jmakowec@twcny.rr.com> wrote:
It said Monday & was dated today so I'm guessing it was released today.
here's the link I pulled off the news page I got it from, hope it helps. = =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
Thanks--but I followed the link to Reuters, read the article, and it
does not give a date for the Farstad report itself. Feb.7 is only the
date of the Reuters article. It appears that Reuters dropped the
journalistic ball here!
Guy A
Ripley, TN
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
Guy, it was interesting for me also, so I did a google search on "Wenche
Farstad....Sentience and pain in invertebrates". Sorry, I couldn't copy
the link...webtv thing :). But should be easy to find. John K |
jbkbub
Feb 7
|
| Now John.. I hardly ever swear in print . . . but all ya gotta do is look at
a worm on a hook lol lol. . . . . .. three words about this report HORSE CAH CAH ! ! ! + plus ya ever heard them lobsters screaming in a boiling pot ? I'd bet they
aint callin for a pizza !
|
Joshuall
Feb 8
|
| Thanks, John--will Google Farstad today.
Guy A
Ripley, TN |
Guy
Feb 8
|
| Lobster "screaming" is just gas escaping, like the noise a steam kettle
makes. Worms are stupid. Neither feels pain.... Ok, we get it. I think the distinction being made in the research is "pain" versus "any
reflex to stimuli that humans normally associate with pain." The argument PETA and their ilk advance to oppose sport fishing (and,
eventually, the killing of any animal) has been this: when we cause needless
pain (to fish or bait), we become cruel, brutalizing our victims and in
doing so debasing ourselves. This research was cited on cable TV yesterday
as scientific evidence that undermines PETA's position. The conclusion to
sportsfishermen is, if our bait and the fish we catch are incapable of "pain
awareness," then there's no problem with damaging them. Even if that is true, I doubt it will make any impact on people who oppose
fishing. Regardless of whether the worm or crawdad feels pain as it's
impaled on a hook, a child who hooks the bait associates his own concept of
pain with his actions, and he attributes to the writhing animal his own pain
response. To proceed and repeat the bait-hooking performance, he must harden
or desensitize himself to causing pain in another creature -- whether or not
pain is actually being caused. Eventually, PETA posits, that lesson in how
to turn off "caring about the pain of others" can grow to the ability to
desensitize ourselves against the pain we cause in animals that do feel pain
and also in people. Ultimately, there's no end to PETA's campaign. Since their argument about
harming other living organisms is based on perception and not reality, they
start with the low-hanging fruit (hurting animals for sport), and move to
more controversial targets (hurting animals for utilitarian reasons, like
meat, hides, horns, and hooves). If somehow they were to achieve their goal
of eliminating killing all animals (an impossible dream), it would not be
the end, for it has long been known that plants respond to stimuli, silently
"screaming" as brine shrimp are dumped to their deaths into a nearby pot of
boiling water, or as their own leaves or stems are clipped off. PETA would
just morph itself into PETL -- People for the Ethical Treatment of Life --
or something like that. Joe
_________________________ Not that the critters aren't being harmed, but that they
"Joshuall" <Joshuall@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:dKGdnWrWSNlayJXfRVn-1w@comcast.com...
Now John.. I hardly ever swear in print . . . but all ya gotta do is look at
a worm on a hook lol lol. . . . . .. three words about this report HORSE CAH CAH ! ! ! + plus ya ever heard them lobsters screaming in a boiling pot ? I'd bet they
aint callin for a pizza !
|
Joe
Feb 8
|
| No no no .... here's tha real deal upfront and straight. For years "experts" have been telling us if we cut the line when we gut hook
a fish the hook will rust out in a few days or weeks or months. Remember
that mularky? Now we all know that's a load of crap and studies proved it.
But it made us all feel better about one of the simple downside risks to
fishing e.g. a few fish will pass on to the big pond in the sky. Now some study someplace by some other "expert" has come up with another
theory. Just because an animals brain is small doesn't mean he can't feel
pain. Who says so ? Anybody ask him? Throw any living creature's ass ina
boiling pot of water or stick a spear through it several times and tell them
it dont hurt ! Baloney. This is just a matter of common sense not science.
Remember boys . . . science brought us the famous "The Earth's Flat so
beware of how far from Rome you plan your vacation" And . . ."Sun . .. we
don't need no stinkin Sun...WE'RE the center of the universe" Who needs this
kind of nonsense to overt any guilt trip or ward off any fear of Peta ? Speaking of Peta. Well it's obvious they're a bunch of radical block
heads who will have as much effect on our sport as a fly on a cows ass (and
remember cows don't swat at every one of them that lands there) Again
common sense . . . How much revenue is generated by this industry in the
course of a year (just in this country)? Over a Billion a year in Illinois
alone and we're not anywhere near the top of that list. How many jobs depend
on the sport fishing industry. . . think about it. Boats, tackle , tourism
etc etc. Does anyone really think congress or any other state legislature
will give a white rats butt if a skewered worm can feel it ? Just a bunch of
hooey in my book. Peta is just the cause de jour as far as I'm concerned and
hardly worth the taps on these keyes when it comes to the issue of sports
fishing. Causing pain is a downside of the sport. Sometimes fish get foul hooked,
sometimes anglers get hooked, sometimes people fall out of their boats. The
question is does the downside outweigh the upside and I'm bettin all of us
here are gonna say no. So. . .
fish with lures, don't foul hook and stay away from seafood dammit. <g> p.s. Does anyone know of a study vis a vis if you throw a peta member in a
pot of boiling water what will happen? God Bless America Josh The Bad Bear |
Joshuall
Feb 8
|
| ***It's not the size of the brain, it's the development of said brain as |
Steve
Feb 8
|
| Steve, you did a good job of explaining your views. I would like to
go one farther. My grandson's teacher when he was 7/8 years old was teaching her
students that catching fish on a hook was painful to them. Even
spouted and handed out Peta based info on it. It took me two years of
careful explaining about the difference between bad science that
explains only what the person wants it to and good science that looks
at all facets and finds explinations through peer reviewed research. Just think about it for a minute. Your kids believe everything
teachers say because we stress how important it is to get a good
education and learn as much as possible. Now let a Peta person turn
your childs view to theirs and before you know it, especially if you
do not hunt or fish, and you have an "anti" person aligning with Peta
or some such other group. Don't ever underestimate the anti's. they are well orginized and well
funded. Our best ammo against them is to take a kid fishing and
explain everything to them correctly. If your kids are grown or you
do not have any, pick a different neighbor kid every two weeks or so
over the summer and teach them how to fish. It could go a long way to
help save your sport!!! danl4x@charter.net
Remove the x for e-mail reply
www.outdoorfrontiers.com
www.SecretWeaponLures.com |
Dan
Feb 8
|
| rights movement. Joe, I make most my living stringing words together in a manner designed to
illuminate and illustrate a given topic. Toward that end I read a lot of
what others write in the non-fiction, educational, reportorial and
editorial disciplines. Rarely have I run across anything as succinct,
well constructed, accurate and illustrative as your words here. KUDOS! |
RichZ
Feb 8
|
| My problem in the whole PETA, environmental thing, is that I have
trouble finding any middle ground to stand on. I was involved in a land
zoning dispute one time in California. Seems a group had decided that
there was a "vernal pool" on the land, and wanted it preserved. Now I
know what a vernal pool is...I also know what a "mud hole" is....this
was a mud hole! Of course they are one in the same depending on what
ground you elect to stand on. The vernal pool defenders won out, and my clients had a mud hole in the
middle of their property that was protected by ordinance! But every
spring when the county sprayed for mosquitoes, they sprayed that mud
hole...killing any "species" that the vernal pool ordinance was designed
to protect. After years of doing battle, the owners were finally allowed to grade
the property and build on it...eliminating the sacred, mosquitoe
infested mud hole! Too much knowledge in the wrong "brains" is a dangerous thing! JK |
jbkbub
Feb 8
|
| On Tue, 08 Feb 2005 18:18:35 -0500, RichZ |
Guy
Feb 8
|
| Thanks for the Bravo Zulu, Rich. High praise, indeed. Joe "RichZ" <remove_the_obvious_fin-sfish@charter.net> wrote in message
news:vRbOd.13203$ba6.4097@fe03.lga...
Joe Haubenreich wrote:
>> a whole bunch of stuff about the 'logic' that drives the animal
rights movement. Joe, I make most my living stringing words together in a manner designed to
illuminate and illustrate a given topic. Toward that end I read a lot of
what others write in the non-fiction, educational, reportorial and
editorial disciplines. Rarely have I run across anything as succinct,
well constructed, accurate and illustrative as your words here. KUDOS! |
Joe
Feb 8
|
|
|
Disclaimer: This is a computer-generated and formatted feed of current postings to a public
Internet forum. We do not control the information delivered, nor do we endorse or monitor its
content. Internet forums may carry offensive, harmful, inaccurate, and otherwise inappropriate material.
|
|