|
Joe H on Charlie I TV
You warned us that you didn't catch much, and that you were afraid you
looked artificially stiff every time the camera was on you. But you did
a credible job. Only thing missed was showing how the blade arm
collapses out of the way of the hook on a strike.Amazing though, to see Charlie catching all those fish off basically
that same little stand of trees. He's usually got the trolling motor on
high and lives and dies by the 'cover water' concept. Today it looked
like the whole show was filmed with Ball Balsley sitting on one dock or
something with the camera. I fished with him once an he moved the boat
so fast I needed 2 ounces of lead to feel bottom with a Carolina rig in
14 feet of water. |
RichZ
Feb 27 2005
|
| Joe,
I tivo'ed it and just finished watching it. I thought you did a great
job presenting the benefits of your bait. The ONLY thing that I didn't
see was a close-up showing just how the blades attach. Someone
unfamiliar with the bait may not realize the blades attach next to one
another instead of in-line. A close-up like this would also point out
the collapsing feature Rich pointed out. I'm afraid it sounds like I'm
being negative about the show, but I'm not. It was a great presentation,
and I'll bet you pick up a lot of business. What I don't understand is why you didn't look at the camera and tell
everyone that if they don't use your bait, they are ignorant morons who
will never catch any fish worth catching! ;) Maybe I'm just getting
different posts mixed up... |
Henry
Feb 27
|
| Thanks. I, too, noticed they didn't include any close-ups, Henry. Out of six
hours of video footage, they ended up with what.... 15 minutes? that they
used for the show. I made sure they shot me going through the whole spiel,
with close-ups of the quick clips and demonstrations of how the blades
collapse on the strike, but none of that made the edit cuts. Hmmmmm..... I didn't think of slamming everyone who didn't use our bait.
Insulting people wasn't my primary objective, but I'll keep that suggestion
in mind for our next show. :-) Joe
Joe,
I tivo'ed it and just finished watching it. I thought you did a great
job presenting the benefits of your bait. The ONLY thing that I didn't
see was a close-up showing just how the blades attach. Someone
unfamiliar with the bait may not realize the blades attach next to one
another instead of in-line. A close-up like this would also point out
the collapsing feature Rich pointed out. I'm afraid it sounds like I'm
being negative about the show, but I'm not. It was a great presentation,
and I'll bet you pick up a lot of business. What I don't understand is why you didn't look at the camera and tell
everyone that if they don't use your bait, they are ignorant morons who
will never catch any fish worth catching! ;) Maybe I'm just getting
different posts mixed up... |
Joe
Feb 27
|
| That is odd.... I fish slowly, anyway, but even I move the boat along faster
than we did that day. Just an example of adapting a fishing style to
conditions, I guess. We started off fishing along the south shore of the lake, and then moved out
into an old, submerged ditch meandering through a long line of standing and
fallen timber. Charlie caught several fish there, but we took off and fished
another stretch of lake shore (nothing) and then some lily pad fields
(again, nothing), followed by some equally unproductive docks. (Well, not
totally unproductive, if you count bluegills....). We ended up going back to
the same ditch twice more, and each time we (he) caught fish, so we ended up
with all our usable footage coming from about a 200 yard section of the
lake. He was trying hard to put me on fish, and the show portrayed it
accurately.... all day long I'd been fishing a 3/8-ounce chartreuse or white
or chartreuse/white spinnerbait with different blade combinations.....
mainly a single willowleaf. Charlie fished a 1/2-ounce bait with a single,
gold willowleaf. When I finally matched his bait (I put on a 1/2-ounce Blue
Avenger), then the bait dropped down about a foot on the same retrieve
speed, and I started getting my hits. At least that day, Charlie pretty much crept along and we picked apart each
tree, pad, dock and brush pile. He had fished the same lake earlier in the
week (taping another show) and had done better. Joe
__________________
"RichZ" <remove_the_obvious_fin-sfish@charter.net> wrote in message
news:DFpUd.23917$NY6.19492@fe03.lga...
You warned us that you didn't catch much, and that you were afraid you
looked artificially stiff every time the camera was on you. But you did
a credible job. Only thing missed was showing how the blade arm
collapses out of the way of the hook on a strike. Amazing though, to see Charlie catching all those fish off basically
that same little stand of trees. He's usually got the trolling motor on
high and lives and dies by the 'cover water' concept. Today it looked
like the whole show was filmed with Ball Balsley sitting on one dock or
something with the camera. I fished with him once an he moved the boat
so fast I needed 2 ounces of lead to feel bottom with a Carolina rig in
14 feet of water. |
Joe
Feb 27
|
| Good show Joe. Your two bass--especially that last one--made for a good
ending. Are you expecting a spike in sales? It seems like maybe that might
happen throughout the industry after something is seen on a show. Another thing I was wondering about: Charlie kept talking about a bigger
blade for more vibration in the murky water, but he was using a willowleaf.
I'm hardly a spinnerbait expert, but it seems that the Colorado is
unanimously said to produce more vibration, including the blade chart on
your site, so why didn't Chas. use one? |
Marty
Feb 28
|
| Great question, Marty! You asked: "...I was wondering about: Charlie kept talking about a bigger
blade for more vibration in the murky water, but he was using a willowleaf.
I'm hardly a spinnerbait expert, but it seems that the Colorado is
unanimously said to produce more vibration, including the blade chart on
your site, so why didn't Chas. use one?" Maybe I can jump in for a moment here & give Joe a moment to rest his brain
before he replies. I sure wasn't there, but I know of at least two major
factors that Charlie was taking into consideration there: water temperature
& water clarity. Water temperature: even though this trip was a still a recent end of winter
event, the water temperature in the mid-south where it took place was
significantly higher than it would have been in latitudes even just a few
hundred miles farther north. Therefore, the increased metabolism of the LM
there required a slightly faster retrieve than would have been needed by
their colder & more lethargic cousins farther north. Therefore, Charlie's
extensive experience led him to choose the lower sound output of the
willowleaf as compared to that of the Colorado, and it sure worked. Water clarity: It appeared that Charlie & Joe were fishing murky water, but
it was not muddy. This means the bass were still able to sight feed, for
which their bodies are best adapted. For that reason, the increased visual
strengths of the willowleaf was mandated. If the water had actually been
muddy, the main job of targeting their prey would have forced the bass to
rely on using their lateral lines, then their ears, to nail their prey. Then
it would have been a job for the far noisier Colorado. I am anxious to hear Joe's eventual reply to see if this important question
was addressed among the myriad of other things going on. Fishing never gets
dull, does it? I love it!
|
Bob
Feb 28
|
| I thought Joe did a pretty darned good job on the show. It's not an easy
thing to be on camera. You've always got that niggling little fear in the
back of your mind that you're going to do or say something stupid that will
make its way to broadcast. I did wish that the features and benefits had been covered a little more
thoroughly, but it's easy for me to sit here and play Monday Morning
Quarterback. All in all, a very positive piece that should help SW sales. |
Steve
Feb 28
|
| I don't recall if I asked, but I know that Charlie prefers to throw a
willowleaf any time he can. If he wants more vibration, he just increases
the size of the blade. That's one thing he admired about our bait... how
easy it is to change to whatever you think you need. I handed him a
1/2-ounce bait with a #4.5 willowleaf, and he picked out a bigger willowleaf
blade, passing up the Colorado's and Indiana blades in my palm. I believe it
just comes down to confidence. That, plus maybe 30 years of experience. Remember his saying toward the end to put him down for a couple of ProPacks?
Those are the kits with 8 heads, 16 skirts, and 36 blades? What you didn't
hear, because it got edited out, was his saying all he wanted in his kits
were 3/16-ounce and 1/2-ounce Chartreuse and White, and a double helping of
gold willowleaf blades. No 3/8-ounce baits for him.... although that's over
80% of what we sell. He throws 1/2-ounce three seasons of the year and drops to the 3/16-ounce in
summertime. Every time he throws a spinnerbait, it has a trailer, too....
White (or chartreuse) split-tail eel in summer, fall, and winter, but a
curly tail trailer in springtime for extra action. You may have noticed him
saying that was not so much to attract attention, but to give the fish more
to slurp up and get hung up in the gill plates, which he believes increases
his hook-up percentage. Interesting idea. Joe
_____________
"Marty" <Mart915@REEMOOVEfrontiernet.net> wrote in message
news:e7yUd.10797$p52.2941@news02.roc.ny...
Good show Joe. Your two bass--especially that last one--made for a good
ending. Are you expecting a spike in sales? It seems like maybe that might
happen throughout the industry after something is seen on a show. Another thing I was wondering about: Charlie kept talking about a bigger
blade for more vibration in the murky water, but he was using a willowleaf.
I'm hardly a spinnerbait expert, but it seems that the Colorado is
unanimously said to produce more vibration, including the blade chart on
your site, so why didn't Chas. use one? |
Joe
Feb 28
|
| Bob, thanks for taking the time to write that very interesting and
informative reply. |
Marty
Mar 1
|
|
|
Disclaimer: This is a computer-generated and formatted feed of current postings to a public
Internet forum. We do not control the information delivered, nor do we endorse or monitor its
content. Internet forums may carry offensive, harmful, inaccurate, and otherwise inappropriate material.
|
|